BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

483 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7269615)

  • 1. [Intrauterine contraception with copper-T 200 device- a retrospective analysis of 334 cases (author's transl)].
    Salzer H; Schneider WH; Eppel W
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1981 May; 93(11):354-8. PubMed ID: 7269615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
    Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Steroid intra-uterine contraception: progesterone-releasing devices. II. Insertion, clinical problems and contraceptive dependability].
    Custo GM; Cosmi EV
    Patol Clin Ostet Ginecol; 1984; 12(4):331-43. PubMed ID: 12340352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Study of side-effects of Cu-T as intra-uterine contraceptive device in post medical termination of pregnancy and interval cases.
    Das CR; Pradhan G
    J Indian Med Assoc; 1995 Oct; 93(10):375-6. PubMed ID: 9053409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Complications associated with IUD use in a family practice setting.
    Lewis RD; Shank C
    J Fam Pract; 1979 Jan; 8(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 759549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term cytologic studies of copper-IUD users.
    Engineer AD; Misra JS; Tandon P
    Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(5):550-6. PubMed ID: 6945020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative study of safety and efficacy of IUD insertions by physicians and nursing personnel in Brazil.
    Lassner KJ; Chen CH; Kropsch LA; Oberle MW; Lopes IM; Morris L
    Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1995 Sep; 29(3):206-15. PubMed ID: 8520606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Immediate postabortion intrauterine contraception in nulliparous adolescents.
    Goldman JA; Dekel A; Reichman J
    Isr J Med Sci; 1979 Jun; 15(6):522-5. PubMed ID: 457386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the delta copper T and the copper T 200 in Bologna, Italy.
    Melega C; Biscontin S; Canedi L; Marchesini FP; Tirelli S; Bartolotti T; Flamigni C
    Acta Eur Fertil; 1986; 17(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 3727892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper 375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative clinical trial.
    Arowojolu AO; Otolorin EO; Ladipo OA
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 1995 Mar; 24(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 7495202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A three-year study of the copper-7 minigravigard intrauterine contraceptive device in nulliparous women.
    Srisupandit S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1988 Jun; 71(6):294-7. PubMed ID: 3171448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety of copper T as contraceptive after caesarean section.
    Parikh V; Gandhi AS
    J Indian Med Assoc; 1989 May; 87(5):113-5. PubMed ID: 2600433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Results of the follow-up of the position of intra-uterine device by ultra-sonography (author's transl)].
    Schmidt EH; Wagner H; Quakernack K; Beller FK
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1979 Feb; 39(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 761755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Twelve-month comparative multicenter study of the TCu 380A and ML 250 intrauterine devices in Bangkok, Thailand.
    Reinprayoon D; Gilmore C; Farr G; Amatya R
    Contraception; 1998 Oct; 58(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 9865999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The copper-7 intrauterine contraceptive device: 5-year evaluation.
    Sellors JW
    Can Med Assoc J; 1981 Oct; 125(7):717-20. PubMed ID: 7326653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statement on intrauterine devices (IUDs).
    International Planned Parenthood Federation IPPF. International Medical Advisory Panel IMAP
    IPPF Med Bull; 1987 Dec; 21(6):3-5. PubMed ID: 12268853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficiency and acceptability of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Trutko NS
    Acta Med Hung; 1986; 43(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 3588154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intrauterine devices (IUDs) and their complications (clinical evaluation of 2013 women with IUD in-situ).
    Ayhan A; Ozalp S; Aslan A
    Acta Reprod Turc; 1982 Oct; 4(2):34-8. PubMed ID: 12267258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The clinical efficacy of the copper-containing intrauterine devices Nova T and Copper-T-200 Ag in a randomized study (author's transl)].
    Altmann G; Feichtinger W; Havelec L; Beck A
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1981 Sep; 93(17):556-8. PubMed ID: 7303702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The TCu380 IUD: initial international experimental results with the latest "T" family IUD].
    Elia D; Belaisch J
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1985 Sep; 13(9):973-8. PubMed ID: 12267501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.