These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7271566)

  • 1. Cochlear responses to dynamic click patterns in the guinea pig.
    Nowak R; Opitz H
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1981; 230(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 7271566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Cochlear responses to dynamic click pattern in the guinea pig].
    Novak R; Opitts G
    Zh Evol Biokhim Fiziol; 1981; 17(5):461-6. PubMed ID: 7293563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interactions of adaptation and masking in the guinea pig cochlea.
    Nowak R; Opitz H
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1982; 234(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 7092708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relation of receptor potentials of cochlear hair cells to spike discharges of cochlear neurons.
    Weiss TF
    Annu Rev Physiol; 1984; 46():247-59. PubMed ID: 6370108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variations of cochlear microphonic potential after sectioning efferent fibers to the cochlea.
    Bonfils P; Remond MC; Pujol R
    Hear Res; 1987; 30(2-3):267-71. PubMed ID: 3680069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The origin of the low-frequency microphonic in the first cochlear turn of guinea-pig.
    Patuzzi RB; Yates GK; Johnstone BM
    Hear Res; 1989 May; 39(1-2):177-88. PubMed ID: 2737964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Role of suppressive interactions in the cochlear microphonic response to wide-band clicks.
    Legouix JP; Avan P
    Hear Res; 1985; 19(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 4066521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Origin of the guinea pig cochlear action potential produced by a click.
    Johnstone JR
    Hear Res; 1981 Jul; 4(3-4):347-52. PubMed ID: 7263520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Voltage-dependent elements are involved in the generation of the cochlear microphonic and the sound-induced resistance changes measured in scala media of the guinea pig.
    Mountain DC; Hubbard AE; Geisler CD
    Hear Res; 1980 Oct; 3(3):215-29. PubMed ID: 7440425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of centrifugal pathways on responses of cochlear nucleus neurons to signals in noise.
    Mulders WH; Seluakumaran K; Robertson D
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 27(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 18279322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cochlear microphonic responses to acoustic clicks in guinea pig and their relation with microphonic responses to pure tones.
    Echeverría EL; Robles LW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Feb; 73(2):592-601. PubMed ID: 6841799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in endolymphatic potential and crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation alter cochlear mechanics.
    Mountain DC
    Science; 1980 Oct; 210(4465):71-2. PubMed ID: 7414321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Loudness adaptation accompanying ribbon synapse and auditory nerve disorders.
    Wynne DP; Zeng FG; Bhatt S; Michalewski HJ; Dimitrijevic A; Starr A
    Brain; 2013 May; 136(Pt 5):1626-38. PubMed ID: 23503620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Morphology, synaptology and electrophysiology of the developing cochlea.
    Pujol R
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1985; 421():5-9. PubMed ID: 3862330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changes in cochlear microphonic and neural sensitivity produced by acoustic trauma.
    Patuzzi RB; Yates GK; Johnstone BM
    Hear Res; 1989 May; 39(1-2):189-202. PubMed ID: 2737965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of compound action potential and cochlear microphonic two-tone suppression in the guinea pig.
    Remond MC; Harrison RV; Legouix JP
    Hear Res; 1982 Sep; 8(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 7142036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cochlear microphonic enhancement in two tone interactions.
    Nuttall AL; Dolan DF
    Hear Res; 1991 Feb; 51(2):235-45. PubMed ID: 2032959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Suppression of the acoustically evoked auditory-nerve response by electrical stimulation in the cochlea of the guinea pig.
    Stronks HC; Versnel H; Prijs VF; Klis SF
    Hear Res; 2010 Jan; 259(1-2):64-74. PubMed ID: 19840841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A model of the generation of the cochlear microphonic with nonlinear hair cell transduction and nonlinear basilar membrane mechanics.
    Patuzzi RB
    Hear Res; 1987; 30(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 3680056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory response to intracochlear electric stimuli following furosemide treatment.
    Hu N; Abbas PJ; Miller CA; Robinson BK; Nourski KV; Jeng FC; Abkes BA; Nichols JM
    Hear Res; 2003 Nov; 185(1-2):77-89. PubMed ID: 14599695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.