These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 727174)

  • 1. Reassessment of the "class" concept of disk susceptibility testing. Cephalothin disks versus minimal inhibitory concentrations with eleven cephalosporins.
    Barry AL; Thornsberry C; Jones RN; Fuchs PC; Gavan TL; Gerlach EH
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1978 Dec; 70(6):909-13. PubMed ID: 727174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cefuroxime, cefamandole, cefoxitin, and cephalothin in vitro susceptibility tests: reassessment of the "class representative" concept, confirmation of disk interpretive criteria, and proposed quality control guidelines.
    Barry AL; Jones RN; Thornsberry C
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1983 Aug; 80(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 6881092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. BL-S786, a new parenteral cephalosporin. I. A collaborative in vitro susceptibility comparison to cephalothin against 5,762 clinical bacterial isolates.
    Jones RN; Fuchs PC; Gavan TL; Gerlach EH; Barry A; Thornsberry C
    J Antibiot (Tokyo); 1977 Jul; 30(7):576-82. PubMed ID: 893226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the cefonicid disk test criteria, including disk quality control guidelines.
    Barry AL; Jones RN; Thornsberry C
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Feb; 17(2):232-9. PubMed ID: 6601113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cefuroxime, a new parenteral cephalosporin: collaborative in vitro susceptibility comparison with cephalothin against 5,887 clinical bacterial isolates.
    Jones RN; Fuchs PC; Gavan TL; Gerlach EH; Barry AL; Thornsberry C
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1977 Jul; 12(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 883818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the antibacterial spectra of cephalexin and cefaclor with those of cephalothin and newer cephalosporins: reevaluation of the class representative concept of susceptibility testing.
    Preston DA; Jones RN; Barry AL; Thornsberry C
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Jun; 17(6):1156-8. PubMed ID: 6874906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of BL-S786 with cephalothin, cefamandole and cefoxitin in vitro and in treatment of experimental infections in mice.
    Goering RV; Sanders CC; Sanders W
    J Antibiot (Tokyo); 1978 Apr; 31(4):363-72. PubMed ID: 306989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro susceptibility of cephalothin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae to cefoxitin and BL-S786.
    Meyer RD
    J Antibiot (Tokyo); 1977 Apr; 30(4):326-9. PubMed ID: 324961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Minimal inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations of cefoperazone, cefotaxime, cefuroxime and cefalotin against 90 bacterial strains].
    Mascellino MT; Prignano G; Iegri F; Lorenzi A
    Boll Ist Sieroter Milan; 1982; 61(4):309-19. PubMed ID: 6100234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Antibacterial activity of five cephalosporins.
    Mutton KJ; Harkness JL
    Pathology; 1981 Jan; 13(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 6784093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inability of cephalothin testing to predict cefprozil susceptibility.
    Fung-Tomc J; Stickle T; Doyle C; Huczko E; Kessler RE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Nov; 29(11):2643-7. PubMed ID: 1774280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differences between cephalothin and newer parenterally absorbed cephalosporins in vitro: a justification for separate disks.
    Washington JA II
    J Infect Dis; 1978 May; 137 Suppl():S32-S37. PubMed ID: 349096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative in-vitro activity of cefamandole, cefoxitin, cefuroxime and cephalothin.
    Brorson JE; Norrby R
    Scand J Infect Dis Suppl; 1978; (13):88-93. PubMed ID: 278150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In-vitro activities of cefamandole and cephalothin against 1,881 clinical isolates. A multi-center study.
    Barry AL; Schoenknect FD; Shadomy S; Sherris JC; Thornsberry C; Washington JA; Kammer RB
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1979 Nov; 72(5):858-60. PubMed ID: 506998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro activity and beta-lactamase stability of BL-S786 compared with those of other cephalosporins.
    Aswapokee N; Aswapokee P; Fu KP; Neu HC
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1978 Jul; 14(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 686701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laboratory evaluation of BL-S786, a cephalosporin with broad-spectrum antibacterial activity.
    Leitner F; Misiek M; Pursiano TA; Buck RE; Chisholm DR; DeRegis RG; Tsai YH; Price KE
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1976 Sep; 10(3):426-35. PubMed ID: 984784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [In vitro susceptibility of bacteroidaceae to cefoxitin and cephalothin (author's transl)].
    Werner H; Firsching R; Krasemann C
    Infection; 1977; 5(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 856727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interpretive criteria for cefamandole and cephalothin disk diffusion susceptibility tests.
    Barry AL; Schoenknecht FD; Shadomy S; Sherris JC; Thornsberry C; Washington JA; Kammer RB
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1979 Jan; 15(1):140-1. PubMed ID: 106770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of cefadroxil and cephalothin disk susceptibility test results.
    Barry AL; Jones RN
    J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Jul; 27(7):1460-3. PubMed ID: 2504768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The in vitro spectrum of the cephalosporins.
    Washington JA
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1976 Apr; 51(4):237-50. PubMed ID: 1263595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.