These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7272343)

  • 1. Ligand binding to multiple equivalent sites with steric hindrance.
    Pincus MR; DeLisi C; Rendell M
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 1981 Jul; 675(3-4):392-6. PubMed ID: 7272343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Steric effects on multivalent ligand-receptor binding: exclusion of ligand sites by bound cell surface receptors.
    Hlavacek WS; Posner RG; Perelson AS
    Biophys J; 1999 Jun; 76(6):3031-43. PubMed ID: 10354429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The binding of a ligand to an acceptor undergoing indefinite self-association.
    Nichol LW; Winzor DJ
    J Theor Biol; 1985 Dec; 117(4):597-608. PubMed ID: 4094454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simulation of association curves and 'Scatchard' plots of binding reactions where ligand and receptor are degraded or internalized.
    Beck JS; Goren HJ
    J Recept Res; 1983; 3(5):561-77. PubMed ID: 6323708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Model analysis of surfactant--polymer interaction as cooperative ligand binding to linear lattice.
    Nishio T; Shimizu T
    Biophys Chem; 2005 Aug; 117(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 15907362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ligand competition curves as a diagnostic tool for delineating the nature of site-site interactions: theory.
    Henis YI; Levitzki A
    Eur J Biochem; 1979 Dec; 102(2):449-65. PubMed ID: 527588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of competition binding assays: assessment of the range of validity of a commonly invoked assumption.
    Chatelier RC
    J Recept Res; 1987; 7(6):871-84. PubMed ID: 3450872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correcting binding parameters for interacting ligand-lattice systems.
    Hervy J; Bicout DJ
    Phys Rev E; 2017 Jul; 96(1-1):012417. PubMed ID: 29347100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Curves of ligand binding. The use of hyperbolic functions for expressing titration curves.
    Dixon HB
    Biochem J; 1974 Mar; 137(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 4420319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the analysis of linear binding effects associated with curved Scatchard plots.
    Schwarz G
    Biophys Chem; 1976 Dec; 6(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 1016685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The cooperative binding of large ligands to a one-dimensional lattice: the steric hindrance effect.
    Nishio T; Shimizu T; Kwak JC; Minakata A
    Biophys Chem; 2003 Jun; 104(2):501-8. PubMed ID: 12878317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of ligand heterogeneity on the Scatchard plot. Particular relevance to lipoprotein binding analysis.
    Mendel CM; Licko V; Kane JP
    J Biol Chem; 1985 Mar; 260(6):3451-5. PubMed ID: 2982861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strong Ligand-Protein Interactions Derived from Diffuse Ligand Interactions with Loose Binding Sites.
    Marsh L
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():746980. PubMed ID: 26064949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determination of binding parameters in the presence of coupled reactions.
    Beck JS; Goren HJ
    Cell Biophys; 1985 Mar; 7(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 2408754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Steric hindrance mutagenesis versus alanine scan in mapping of ligand binding sites in the tachykinin NK1 receptor.
    Holst B; Zoffmann S; Elling CE; Hjorth SA; Schwartz TW
    Mol Pharmacol; 1998 Jan; 53(1):166-75. PubMed ID: 9443945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated site-directed drug design: the formation of molecular templates in primary structure generation.
    Lewis RA; Dean PM
    Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1989 Mar; 236(1283):141-62. PubMed ID: 2565578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The multiple origins of cooperativity in binding to multi-site lattices.
    Sackett DL; Saroff HA
    FEBS Lett; 1996 Nov; 397(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 8941702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of binding site neighbor-effect parameters to evaluate the interactions between adjacent ligands on a linear lattice. Effects on ligand-lattice association.
    Wolfe AR; Meehan T
    J Mol Biol; 1992 Feb; 223(4):1063-87. PubMed ID: 1538390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preferential ligand binding to multi-state acceptor systems: the unexplored paradox of acceptor self-association that is ligand-mediated but detrimental to ligand binding.
    Gow A; Winzor DJ; Smith R
    J Theor Biol; 1990 Aug; 145(3):407-20. PubMed ID: 2232825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Soft docking and multiple receptor conformations in virtual screening.
    Ferrari AM; Wei BQ; Costantino L; Shoichet BK
    J Med Chem; 2004 Oct; 47(21):5076-84. PubMed ID: 15456251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.