These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7272415)

  • 1. Matching in epidemiologic studies: validity and efficiency considerations.
    Kupper LL; Karon JM; Kleinbaum DG; Morgenstern H; Lewis DK
    Biometrics; 1981 Jun; 37(2):271-91. PubMed ID: 7272415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On design considerations and randomization-based inference for community intervention trials.
    Gail MH; Mark SD; Carroll RJ; Green SB; Pee D
    Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(11):1069-92. PubMed ID: 8804140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving the efficiency of nested case-control studies of interaction by selecting controls using counter matching on exposure.
    Cologne JB; Sharp GB; Neriishi K; Verkasalo PK; Land CE; Nakachi K
    Int J Epidemiol; 2004 Jun; 33(3):485-92. PubMed ID: 15105408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
    Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficiency of case-control studies with multiple controls per case: continuous or dichotomous data.
    Ury HK
    Biometrics; 1975 Sep; 31(3):643-9. PubMed ID: 1100136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of efficient designs for observational epidemiologic studies.
    Kalish LA; Begg CB
    Biometrics; 1987 Mar; 43(1):145-67. PubMed ID: 3567303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In defense of matching.
    Karon JM; Kupper LL
    Am J Epidemiol; 1982 Nov; 116(5):852-66. PubMed ID: 7148808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Matching.
    Costanza MC
    Prev Med; 1995 Sep; 24(5):425-33. PubMed ID: 8524715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A simulation study of control sampling methods for nested case-control studies of genetic and molecular biomarkers and prostate cancer progression.
    Wang MH; Shugart YY; Cole SR; Platz EA
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 Mar; 18(3):706-11. PubMed ID: 19258478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selection of subjects for hospital-based epidemiologic studies based on outward manifestations of disease.
    Nishioka SA; Gyorkos TW; Joseph L; Collet JP
    Clin Invest Med; 2001 Dec; 24(6):299-303. PubMed ID: 11767233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bias from matching on age at death or censor in nested case-control studies.
    Hein MJ; Deddens JA; Schubauer-Berigan MK
    Epidemiology; 2009 May; 20(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 19289956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of control selection in nested case-control studies: the example of exposure to antiretroviral treatment (ART) and the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) in the French Hospital Database on HIV (FHDH-ANRS CO4).
    Guiguet M; Mary-Krause M; Ename B; Costagliola D; Grabar S
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 May; 17(5):468-74. PubMed ID: 18324608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On pooling across strata when frequency matching has been followed in a cohort study.
    Weinberg CR
    Biometrics; 1985 Mar; 41(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 4005370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What matched comparisons can and cannot tell us: the case of cochlear implants.
    Sagi E; Fitzgerald MB; Svirsky MA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):571-9. PubMed ID: 17609617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adjusting for selection bias in retrospective, case-control studies.
    Geneletti S; Richardson S; Best N
    Biostatistics; 2009 Jan; 10(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 18482997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pair-matching-a reappraisal of a popular technique.
    McKinlay SM
    Biometrics; 1977 Dec; 33(4):725-35. PubMed ID: 588658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Matching in studies of classification accuracy: implications for analysis, efficiency, and assessment of incremental value.
    Janes H; Pepe MS
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 17501939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strategy for genotoxicity testing: hazard identification and risk assessment in relation to in vitro testing.
    Thybaud V; Aardema M; Clements J; Dearfield K; Galloway S; Hayashi M; Jacobson-Kram D; Kirkland D; MacGregor JT; Marzin D; Ohyama W; Schuler M; Suzuki H; Zeiger E;
    Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 627(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 17126066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A computer program to estimate power and relative efficiency to assess multiplicative interactions in flexibly matched case-control studies.
    Stürmer T; Gefeller O; Brenner H
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2004 Jun; 74(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 15135577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Case-control studies in clinical research: mechanism and prevention of selection bias.
    Morabia A
    Prev Med; 1997; 26(5 Pt 1):674-7. PubMed ID: 9327476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.