These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

49 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7275113)

  • 1. Electrophysiological and psychophysical characteristics of perception of amplitude-modulated noise.
    Bakai EA; Slavinskii EYu
    Hum Physiol; 1981; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 7275113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficient stimuli for evoking auditory steady-state responses.
    John MS; Dimitrijevic A; Picton TW
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):406-23. PubMed ID: 14534411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of auditory noise on the psychophysical detection of visual signals: cross-modal stochastic resonance.
    Manjarrez E; Mendez I; Martinez L; Flores A; Mirasso CR
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Mar; 415(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 17276601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Noise-induced increase in human auditory evoked neuromagnetic fields.
    Alain C; Quan J; McDonald K; Van Roon P
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jul; 30(1):132-42. PubMed ID: 19558607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Roughness perception in sounds: behavioral and ERP evidence.
    De Baene W; Vandierendonck A; Leman M; Widmann A; Tervaniemi M
    Biol Psychol; 2004 Nov; 67(3):319-30. PubMed ID: 15294389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of acoustic gradient noise from functional magnetic resonance imaging on auditory processing as reflected by event-related brain potentials.
    Novitski N; Alho K; Korzyukov O; Carlson S; Martinkauppi S; Escera C; Rinne T; Aronen HJ; Näätänen R
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jul; 14(1 Pt 1):244-51. PubMed ID: 11525334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Perception of impulse signals and human evaluation of the direction of motion of a sound source in the context of medium intensity noise].
    Vartanian IA; Andreeva IG
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1998; 24(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 9567468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for normally hearing subjects.
    Kluk K; Moore BC
    Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 194(1-2):118-34. PubMed ID: 15276683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrophysiological and psychophysical asymmetries in sensitivity to interaural correlation steps.
    Lüddemann H; Riedel H; Kollmeier B
    Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 256(1-2):39-57. PubMed ID: 19555753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficient stimuli for recording of the amplitude modulation following response.
    Stürzebecher E; Cebulla M; Pschirrer U
    Audiology; 2001; 40(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 11409764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Both frequency and interaural delay affect event-related potential responses to binaural gap.
    Huang Y; Kong L; Fan S; Wu X; Li L
    Neuroreport; 2008 Nov; 19(17):1673-8. PubMed ID: 18806687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural interactions within and beyond the critical band elicited by two simultaneously presented narrow band noises: a magnetoencephalographic study.
    Okamoto H; Stracke H; Pantev C
    Neuroscience; 2008 Feb; 151(3):913-20. PubMed ID: 18191899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influences of auditory object formation on phonemic restoration.
    Shinn-Cunningham BG; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):295-301. PubMed ID: 18177159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptual consequences of disrupted auditory nerve activity.
    Zeng FG; Kong YY; Michalewski HJ; Starr A
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 93(6):3050-63. PubMed ID: 15615831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neuromagnetic evaluation of binaural unmasking.
    Sasaki T; Kawase T; Nakasato N; Kanno A; Ogura M; Tominaga T; Kobayashi T
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(3):684-9. PubMed ID: 15808969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory filter widths in children and adults.
    Soderquist DR
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1993 Dec; 56(3):371-84. PubMed ID: 8301244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Observations on amplitude modulated acoustical noise signals.
    Rodenburg M; van den Brink G
    Pflugers Arch; 1969; 311(2):197-8. PubMed ID: 5388465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age-related changes in transient and oscillatory brain responses to auditory stimulation in healthy adults 19-45 years old.
    Poulsen C; Picton TW; Paus T
    Cereb Cortex; 2007 Jun; 17(6):1454-67. PubMed ID: 16916887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of contralateral noise on 40-Hz and 80-Hz auditory steady-state responses.
    Maki A; Kawase T; Kobayashi T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):584-9. PubMed ID: 19550336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Late auditory evoked potentials asymmetry revisited.
    Hine J; Debener S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jun; 118(6):1274-85. PubMed ID: 17462945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.