These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 727713)
1. Choice of ascertainment model I. Discrimination between single-proband models by means of birth order data. Stene J Ann Hum Genet; 1978 Oct; 42(2):219-29. PubMed ID: 727713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Choice of ascertainment model II. Discrimination between multi-proband models by means of birth order data. Stene J Ann Hum Genet; 1979 May; 42(4):493-505. PubMed ID: 475336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ascertainment models for human families selected through several affected children. Stene J Biometrics; 1978 Sep; 34(3):455-7. PubMed ID: 719123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ascertainment models incorporating effects of variable age of onset. Dawson DV Am J Med Genet; 1994 Dec; 53(4):340-7. PubMed ID: 7864043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The essence of single ascertainment. Hodge SE; Vieland VJ Genetics; 1996 Nov; 144(3):1215-23. PubMed ID: 8913762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ascertainment corrections based on smaller family units. Bonney GE Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Oct; 63(4):1202-15. PubMed ID: 9758615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Primogeniture and fertility: fertility models with unequal bequest. Parsons DO Res Popul Econ; 1984; 5():167-83. PubMed ID: 12266411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A bivariate problem in human genetics: ascertainment of families through a correlated trait. Dawson DV; Elston RC Am J Med Genet; 1984 Jul; 18(3):435-48. PubMed ID: 6476005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ascertainment and goodness of fit of variance component models for pedigree data. Boehnke M; Lange K Prog Clin Biol Res; 1984; 147():173-92. PubMed ID: 6547532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inherent intractability of the ascertainment problem for pedigree data: a general likelihood framework. Vieland VJ; Hodge SE Am J Hum Genet; 1995 Jan; 56(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 7825595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genetic analysis of late-onset diseases using first-degree relatives. Sobel E; Davanipour Z; Alter M Neuroepidemiology; 1988; 7(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 3374730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of proband designation on segregation analysis. Greenberg DA Am J Hum Genet; 1986 Sep; 39(3):329-39. PubMed ID: 3766539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A cooperative binomial ascertainment model. Ginsburg EKh; Axenovich TI Am J Hum Genet; 1992 Nov; 51(5):1156-60. PubMed ID: 1415257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ascertainment correction for Markov chain Monte Carlo segregation and linkage analysis of a quantitative trait. Ma J; Amos CI; Warwick Daw E Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 31(6):594-604. PubMed ID: 17487893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of conditioning on probands to correct for multiple ascertainment. Boehnke M; Greenberg DA Am J Hum Genet; 1984 Nov; 36(6):1298-308. PubMed ID: 6517053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A statistical analysis of birth-order effects with application to data on pyloric stenosis. Gladstien K; Spence MA Ann Hum Genet; 1978 Oct; 42(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 727712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assumptions for different ascertainment models in human genetics. Williams JS; Stene J Biometrics; 1977 Sep; 33(3):523-7. PubMed ID: 911972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Some probability models for ascertainment of families in segregation analysis. Sharma HL Janasamkhya; 1985; 3(1-2):97-102. PubMed ID: 12340879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]