These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
45. Medical audit data: counting is not enough. Lyons C; Gumpert R BMJ; 1990 Jun; 300(6739):1563-6. PubMed ID: 2372625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Quality care is job one. Warnock GL Can J Surg; 2005 Feb; 48(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 15757028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. The PRO utilization and quality review process: an overview--Part II. Politser P Bull Am Coll Surg; 1989 Jun; 74(6):18-20. PubMed ID: 10293127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. An audit of investigational services within general medical units. Newble DI; Wangel AG; Nelson AW Aust N Z J Med; 1982 Apr; 12(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 6953959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Medical care review in Australia: 2 A focus on the process and outcome of medical care. Legge D Aust Clin Rev; 1981 Nov; (3):29-37. PubMed ID: 6762874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. An audit of transfers for neonatal surgical care in England in 2007. Burge D; Youle L; McIntosh N Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2009 Jul; 94(4):F290-3. PubMed ID: 19017684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Mark of approval. Shaw CD Health Soc Serv J; 1978 Jun; 88(4595):664-6. PubMed ID: 10308160 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Surgeon-specific wound infection rates--a potentially dangerous and misleading strategy. Scheckler WE Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 1988 Apr; 9(4):145-6. PubMed ID: 3361108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Cumulative sum techniques for surgeons: a brief review. Yap CH; Colson ME; Watters DA ANZ J Surg; 2007 Jul; 77(7):583-6. PubMed ID: 17610698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Decreasing delays in urgent and expedited surgery in a university teaching hospital through audit and communication between peri-operative and surgical directorates. Cosgrove JF; Gaughan M; Snowden CP; Lees T Anaesthesia; 2008 Jun; 63(6):599-603. PubMed ID: 18477270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. An approach to the ethical evaluation of innovative surgical procedures. Tan VK; Chow PK Ann Acad Med Singap; 2011 Jan; 40(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 21369629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Severity scores in surgery: what for and who needs them? Galland RB Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2002 Apr; 387(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 11981686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Proceedings: Utilization review, medical audit, and peer review. Scott JC J Reprod Med; 1974 Feb; 12(2):57-8. PubMed ID: 4855852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. The quality of hand-written operative notes in a surgical unit at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital (QECH), Malawi: A prospective completed audit loop study. Nyamulani N; Mulwafu W Malawi Med J; 2018 Jun; 30(2):86-89. PubMed ID: 30627334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Surgical audit in a district general hospital: a stimulus for improving patient care. Earlam R Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1987 Sep; 69(5):251-2. PubMed ID: 3674693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]