These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7279338)

  • 1. Continuous fetal monitoring following third-trimester amniocentesis.
    Klein SA; Young BK; Wilson SJ; Katz M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Oct; 58(4):444-9. PubMed ID: 7279338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonstress testing and perinatal outcome.
    Rayburn W; Greene J; Donaldson M
    J Reprod Med; 1980 May; 24(5):191-6. PubMed ID: 7401050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Continuing role of the nonstress test in the management of postdates pregnancy.
    Phelan JP; Platt LD; Yeh SY; Trujillo M; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Nov; 64(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 6493655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk of third-trimester amniocentesis: a case-control study.
    Hodor JG; Poggi SH; Spong CY; Goodwin KM; Vink JS; Pezzullo JC; Ghidini A
    Am J Perinatol; 2006 Apr; 23(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 16586234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fetal heart rate response to amniocentesis in cases of decreased fetal movements.
    Ron M; Yaffe H; Sadovsky E
    Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Oct; 48(4):456-9. PubMed ID: 967384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nonstress test prediction of fetal status.
    Gandhi J; Gugliucci CL
    J Reprod Med; 1982 Feb; 27(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 7097665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk factors for procedure-related fetal losses after mid-trimester genetic amniocentesis.
    Kong CW; Leung TN; Leung TY; Chan LW; Sahota DS; Fung TY; Lau TK
    Prenat Diagn; 2006 Oct; 26(10):925-30. PubMed ID: 16838383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simultaneous nonstress fetal heart rate testing in twin pregnancy.
    Devoe LD; Azor H
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Oct; 58(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 7279339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Diagnostic evaluation of fetal distress during pregnancy by a sound stimulation test].
    Querleu D; Boutteville C; Renard X; Crépin G
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1984; 13(7):789-96. PubMed ID: 6526980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Prenatal monitoring of fetal heart activity and the course of labor and the state of the newborn infant].
    Leibschang J; Troszyński M; Raczyński A; Adamowicz R
    Probl Med Wieku Rozwoj; 1979; 8():228-37. PubMed ID: 263522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative study of stressed and nonstressed antepartum fetal heart rate testing.
    Keane MW; Horger EO; Vice L
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Mar; 57(3):320-4. PubMed ID: 7465146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive value of the nonreactive nonstress test in evaluating neonatal outcome.
    Bhide A; Bhattacharya MS
    J Postgrad Med; 1990 Apr; 36(2):104-5. PubMed ID: 2097363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perinatal outcome with the modified biophysical profile.
    Nageotte MP; Towers CV; Asrat T; Freeman RK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1672-6. PubMed ID: 8203424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of nonstress fetal heart rate testing in multiple gestations.
    Blake GD; Knuppel RA; Ingardia CJ; Lake M; Aumann G; Hanson M
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Apr; 63(4):528-32. PubMed ID: 6700901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Human fetal breathing movements: basic analysis and clinical relationship to fetal well-being (author's transl)].
    Higuchi M; Hirano H; Takahashi H; Mochizuki O; Maki M; Hasegawa M
    Acta Obstet Gynaecol Jpn; 1981 May; 33(5):597-606. PubMed ID: 7234348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Different types of variable decelerations and their effects to neonatal outcome.
    Kazandi M; Sendag F; Akercan F; Terek MC; Gundem G
    Singapore Med J; 2003 May; 44(5):243-7. PubMed ID: 13677360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring in low-risk pregnancies.
    Westgren M; Ingemarsson E; Ingemarsson I; Solum T
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Sep; 56(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 7422168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The results of a five-year study of continuous fetal monitoring on an obstetric service.
    Gabert HA; Stenchever MA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Sep; 50(3):275-9. PubMed ID: 896094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maternal perception of fetal movement and perinatal outcome.
    Rayburn WF; McKean HE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 56(2):161-4. PubMed ID: 7393504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risks of third-trimester amniocentesis.
    Zalud I; Janas S
    J Reprod Med; 2008 Jan; 53(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 18251361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.