79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7280252)
1. Low-dose CT scanning for quantitative spinal mineral analysis.
Cann CE
Radiology; 1981 Sep; 140(3):813-5. PubMed ID: 7280252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetry and adequacy of CT-based attenuation correction for pediatric PET: phantom study.
Fahey FH; Palmer MR; Strauss KJ; Zimmerman RE; Badawi RD; Treves ST
Radiology; 2007 Apr; 243(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 17293575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Precise measurement of vertebral mineral content using computed tomography.
Cann CE; Genant HK
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1980 Aug; 4(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 7391292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vertebral mineral determination by quantitative computed tomography (QCT): accuracy of single and dual energy measurements.
Glüer CC; Reiser UJ; Davis CA; Rutt BK; Genant HK
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1988; 12(2):242-58. PubMed ID: 3351039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Local differences in mineral content in vertebral trabecular bone measured by dual-energy computed tomography.
Nepper-Rasmussen J; Mosekilde L
Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(4):369-71. PubMed ID: 2775598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vertebral CT scanning.
Stevenson JC; Banks LM
Scott Med J; 1986 Jul; 31(3):207-10. PubMed ID: 3798091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A postprocessing dual energy technique for vertebral CT densitometry.
Laval-Jeantet AM; Cann CE; Roger B; Dallant P
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1984 Dec; 8(6):1164-7. PubMed ID: 6501625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Empirical beam hardening correction in the measurement of vertebral bone mineral content by computed tomography.
Imamura K; Fujii M
Radiology; 1981 Jan; 138(1):223-6. PubMed ID: 7470214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dual energy CT of the chest: how about the dose?
Schenzle JC; Sommer WH; Neumaier K; Michalski G; Lechel U; Nikolaou K; Becker CR; Reiser MF; Johnson TR
Invest Radiol; 2010 Jun; 45(6):347-53. PubMed ID: 20404737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor technology for organ dose assessment during CT: comparison with thermoluminescent dosimetry.
Yoshizumi TT; Goodman PC; Frush DP; Nguyen G; Toncheva G; Sarder M; Barnes L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 May; 188(5):1332-6. PubMed ID: 17449779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Polymer gel dosimetry on a multislice computed tomography scanner: effect of changing parameters on CTDI.
Hill B; Venning AJ; Baldock C
Phys Med; 2008 Sep; 24(3):149-58. PubMed ID: 18289906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a prototype dual-energy computed tomographic apparatus. II. Determination of vertebral bone mineral content.
Vetter JR; Perman WH; Kalender WA; Mazess RB; Holden JE
Med Phys; 1986; 13(3):340-3. PubMed ID: 3724694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient and personnel exposure during CT fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures.
Nawfel RD; Judy PF; Silverman SG; Hooton S; Tuncali K; Adams DF
Radiology; 2000 Jul; 216(1):180-4. PubMed ID: 10887246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determination of the weighted CT dose index in modern multi-detector CT scanners.
Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Tzedakis A; Papadakis A; Theocharopoulos N; Gourtsoyiannis N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 52(21):6485-95. PubMed ID: 17951857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. X-ray field size and patient dosimetry.
Fauber TL; Dempsey MC
Radiol Technol; 2013; 85(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 24255139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computed tomographic scanning in children: comparison of radiation dose and resolving power of commercial CT scanners.
Brasch RC; Boyd DP; Gooding CA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Jul; 131(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 97992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of MDCT radiation dose: a phantom study.
Moore WH; Bonvento M; Olivieri-Fitt R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Nov; 187(5):W498-502. PubMed ID: 17056880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Quantitative computerized tomography of the vertebral spongiosa. Proposal of a method applicable to the study of postmenopausal osteoporosis].
Dore R; La Fianza A; Franchi M; Spinillo A; Cichero P; Biazzi L
Radiol Med; 1987 Sep; 74(3):166-70. PubMed ID: 3659424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vertebral mineral status: assessment with single- versus multi-section CT.
Lambiase R; Sartoris DJ; Fellingham L; Andre M; Resnick D
Radiology; 1987 Jul; 164(1):231-6. PubMed ID: 3588911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimation of radiation exposure of retrospective gated and prospective triggered 128-slice triple-rule-out CT angiography.
Ketelsen D; Fenchel M; Thomas C; Buchgeister M; Boehringer N; Tsiflikas I; Kaempf M; Claussen CD; Heuschmid M
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):762-6. PubMed ID: 21498316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
