BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7280545)

  • 1. Analogue and digital filtering of auditory brainstem responses.
    Doyle DJ; Hyde ML
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 7280545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital inverse filtering of distorted auditory brainstem responses.
    Doyle DJ; Hyde ML
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(4):261-3. PubMed ID: 7323677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory brainstem and middle latency responses. I. Effect of response filtering and waveform identification. II. Threshold responses to a 500-HZ tone pip.
    Kavanagh KT; Harker LA; Tyler RS
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1984; 108():1-12. PubMed ID: 6421220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of click-evoked auditory brainstem responses using time domain cross-correlations between interleaved responses.
    Berninger E; Olofsson A; Leijon A
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):318-29. PubMed ID: 24557002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analog and zero phase-shift digital filtering of the auditory brain stem response waveform.
    Domico WD; Kavanagh KT
    Ear Hear; 1986 Dec; 7(6):377-82. PubMed ID: 3792680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analog and digital filtering of the brain stem auditory evoked response.
    Kavanagh KT; Franks R
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1989 Jul; 98(7 Pt 1):508-14. PubMed ID: 2751210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monaural versus binaural auditory brainstem response threshold to clicks masked by high-pass noise in normal-hearing subjects.
    Conijn EA; Brocaar MP; van Zanten GA
    Audiology; 1990; 29(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 2310351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of low-frequency components and analog filtering on auditory brainstem responses. A comparison of analog and digital filtering.
    Svensson O; Almqvist B; Jönsson KE
    Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 3589480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of high-pass filtering on the detection of the auditory brainstem response.
    Mason SM
    Br J Audiol; 1984 Aug; 18(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 6487849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bessel filtering of brain stem auditory evoked potentials.
    Doyle DJ; Hyde ML
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1981 Apr; 51(4):446-8. PubMed ID: 6164544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital filtering and spectral analysis of the low intensity ABR.
    Kavanagh KT; Domico WD; Franks R; Han JC
    Ear Hear; 1988 Feb; 9(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 3342945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Binaural interaction in the auditory brainstem response: a normative study.
    Van Yper LN; Vermeire K; De Vel EF; Battmer RD; Dhooge IJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 126(4):772-9. PubMed ID: 25240247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of high-pass filter frequency and slope on BAEP amplitude, latency and wave form.
    Elton M; Scherg M; Von Cramon D
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1984 May; 57(5):490-4. PubMed ID: 6201344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of band-limited clicks on ABR waves I and V.
    Zerlin S
    Scand Audiol; 1988; 17(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 3206184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of analog and digital filtering on brain stem auditory evoked potentials.
    Boston JR; Ainslie PJ
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1980 Mar; 48(3):361-4. PubMed ID: 6153356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of waveform, latency and amplitude values of chirp ABR in newborns.
    Cebulla M; Lurz H; Shehata-Dieler W
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Apr; 78(4):631-6. PubMed ID: 24529909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of methods for reducing residual noise in suprathreshold early auditory evoked potential registration].
    Mühler R; von Specht H; Pethe J
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Jul; 77(7):382-7. PubMed ID: 9743976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to toneburst and narrow band CE-chirp in young infants.
    Rodrigues GR; Ramos N; Lewis DR
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Sep; 77(9):1555-60. PubMed ID: 23915488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of low pass filtering on the brainstem auditory evoked potential in the rat.
    Shaw NA
    Exp Brain Res; 1987; 65(3):686-90. PubMed ID: 3556497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of high-pass filtering on the waveform and threshold of auditory brainstem responses to tone pips.
    Maurizi M; Paludetti G; Ottaviani F; Rosignoli M
    Audiology; 1986; 25(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 3707437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.