These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7283410)

  • 1. Examination of major disagreements in susceptibility test results by Autobac-1 and MS-2.
    Lindsey NJ; Barnes WG
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1981 Jul; 20(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 7283410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of three automated systems for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli.
    Kelly MT; Latimer JM; Balfour LC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 May; 15(5):902-5. PubMed ID: 7096560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus susceptibility testing by an automated system, Autobac I.
    Cleary TJ; Maurer D
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1978 May; 13(5):837-41. PubMed ID: 248270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laboratory evaluation of a rapid, automatic susceptibility testing system: report of a collaborative study.
    Thornsberry C; Gavan TL; Sherris JC; Balows A; Matsen JM; Sabath LD; Schoenknecht F; Thrupp LD; Washington JA
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1975 Apr; 7(4):466-80. PubMed ID: 1147582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the Autobac 1 susceptibility testing system in a clinical diagnostic laboratory.
    Mogyoros M; Morgan JR; Smith JA
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1977 Apr; 11(4):750-2. PubMed ID: 856028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wide variability in Pseudomonas aeruginosa aminoglycoside results among seven susceptibility testing procedures.
    Staneck JL; Glenn S; DiPersio JR; Leist PA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Oct; 27(10):2277-85. PubMed ID: 2511223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examination of Pseudomonas aeruginosa-gentamicin discrepancies encountered in an Autobac I-disk diffusion comparison.
    Mayo JB; Kiehn TE; Wong B; Bernard EM; Armstrong D
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1982 Mar; 21(3):412-5. PubMed ID: 6808909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two-hospital study of Staphylococcus aureus susceptibility to penicillin and ampicillin by Autobac I.
    Harris PC; Sealey LB
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1980 Dec; 18(6):922-5. PubMed ID: 7235678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laboratory evaluation of amikacin susceptibility testing by the AutoBac I system.
    Boughton WH; Berman SJ; Boughton MT
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Mar; 9(3):397-8. PubMed ID: 457852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy and precision of the autobac system for rapid identification of Gram-negative bacilli: a collaborative evaluation.
    Barry AL; Gavan TL; Smith PB; Matsen JM; Morello JA; Sielaff BH
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Jun; 15(6):1111-9. PubMed ID: 7050149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Australian evaluation of Autobac I with suggested interpretive and technical modifications.
    Funnell GR; Guinness MD
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1979 Sep; 16(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 389157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laboratory evaluation of an automated antimicrobial susceptibility system.
    Stubbs KG; Wicher K
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1977 Dec; 68(6):769-777. PubMed ID: 602916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of antibiotic susceptibility testing by agar dilution and the Micro Media system (Fox Panel).
    Welch WD; Layman MA; Chiles L; Ragsdale R; Kutscher E; Southern PM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Sep; 22(3):387-90. PubMed ID: 3850093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Value of bead-type cassettes for antibiograms of Streptococci in Autobac units].
    Viot M; Cambon P; Blondel P
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1988 May; 36(5):398-402. PubMed ID: 3043336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laboratory detection methods for methicillin resistance in coagulase negative Staphylococcus isolated from ophthalmic infections.
    Oliveira AD; d'Azevedo PA; de Sousa LB; Viana-Niero C; Francisco W; Lottenberg C; Martino MD; Höfling-Lima AL
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2007; 70(4):667-75. PubMed ID: 17906764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparison of the results of antibiograms obtained from blood culture broth and after isolation on agar media with the Autobac 1].
    Flandrois JP; Chomarat M; Coullioud D; Carret G
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1983; 41(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 6869938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Agar disk diffusion for the quality control testing of Autobac elution disks.
    Gaydos JM; Harrington BJ
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1982 Mar; 21(3):516-8. PubMed ID: 6808910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of contamination levels on antimicrobial susceptibilities tested by Autobac I.
    Shahidi A; Choey I
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1980 Mar; 17(3):389-92. PubMed ID: 7425604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Alternative quality control parameters for Autobac susceptibility testing disks: use of agar diffusion zone size results.
    Boshard R; Matsen JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 May; 13(5):814-7. PubMed ID: 6787073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the Uro-Quick, a new rapid automated system, for the detection of well-characterized antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
    Roveta S; Marchese A; Debbia EA
    J Chemother; 2004 Apr; 16(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 15216942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.