These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7284537)

  • 1. An ultrasonic instrument for multi -- dimension measurements.
    Manoli SH
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1981; 17():65-6. PubMed ID: 7284537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The accuracy of ultrasonic measurement of the axial length of the eye.
    Binkhorst RD
    Ophthalmic Surg; 1981 May; 12(5):363-5. PubMed ID: 7266984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrasonic measurement of eye dimensions.
    Coleman DJ
    Int Ophthalmol Clin; 1979; 19(4):225-36. PubMed ID: 536130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Errors in ultrasonic biometry and their correction.
    Gordon D
    Bibl Ophthalmol; 1975; (83):259-62. PubMed ID: 1131226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [An attachment for the ECHO-21 equipment for biometry].
    Artem'ev NV; Mel'nikov VI; Chuprov AD
    Vestn Oftalmol; 1988; 104(1):56-7. PubMed ID: 3369049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An ultrasonic displacement instrument with greater beam dispersal.
    McGough GA; Breazeale D; Mullins GL; Guntheroth WG
    Cardiovasc Res; 1973 Sep; 7(5):713-8. PubMed ID: 4753306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A portable, simple sonomicrometer.
    Stegall HF; Kardon MB; Stone HL; Bishop VS
    J Appl Physiol; 1967 Aug; 23(2):289-93. PubMed ID: 6031199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Choice of instruments in ophthalmologic echography].
    Poujol J
    Annee Ther Clin Ophtalmol; 1986; 37():129-35. PubMed ID: 3314680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of the Xenotec XEI peakseeking biometer system.
    Reeves M; Moses L
    J Am Intraocul Implant Soc; 1979 Jan; 5(1):56-7. PubMed ID: 438080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A simple interferometer for ophthalmic ultrasonic biometry.
    Falbe-Hansen I
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1967; 45(4):552-7. PubMed ID: 6072267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Eight-channel ultrasonic displacement meter for implantable miniature sensors.
    Nakamura T; Hayashi K; Seki J
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1987 May; 25(3):355-8. PubMed ID: 3449735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simplified biometric system with television display.
    Koplin RS; Gersten M
    J Am Intraocul Implant Soc; 1980 Jan; 6(1):57-8. PubMed ID: 7358589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An improved signal processor for the ultrasonic dimension gauge.
    Sia JB; Pace DG; Osborne MW; Zanko MT; Kovzelove F
    Cardiovasc Res; 1980 Aug; 14(8):490-4. PubMed ID: 7438151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multi-frame hardcopy output device for an ultrasonic sector scanner.
    Specht DF
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1980 Apr 21-22; 16():107-16. PubMed ID: 7407292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Overall provision of different medical fields with ultrasonic diagnostic devices].
    Chevnenko AA; Florianovich NM; Skorunskiĭ IA
    Med Tekh; 1980; (6):39-42. PubMed ID: 7442503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comment on: Comparison of the ocular ultrasonic and optical biometry devices in different quality measurements.
    Chaurasiya SK; Singh M; Jha J; Radhika
    J Optom; 2024; 17(3):100507. PubMed ID: 38128436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reply to Comment from Chaurasiya et al. on: Comparison of the ocular ultrasonic and optical biometry devices in different quality measurements.
    Khorrami-Nejad M; Khodair AM; Khodaparast M; Babapour Mofrad F; Dehghanian Nasrabadi F
    J Optom; 2024; 17(3):100511. PubMed ID: 38215612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An ultrasonic instrument for rapid B-scanning of the heart.
    McDicken WN; Bruff K; Paton J
    Ultrasonics; 1974 Nov; 12(6):269-72. PubMed ID: 4428520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fetal biometry: a comparison between experienced sonographers and automated measurements.
    Zalud I; Good S; Carneiro G; Georgescu B; Aoki K; Green L; Shahrestani F; Okumura R
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2009 Jan; 22(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 19165678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved signal processor for the ultrasonic dimension gauge.
    Rubinstein ML; Carlson CJ; Rapaport E
    Am J Physiol; 1977 Aug; 233(2):H322-6. PubMed ID: 888976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.