These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7285594)

  • 1. Sex and cognitive influence on visual hemifield superiority for face and letter recognition.
    Pizzamiglio L; Zoccolotti P
    Cortex; 1981 Jul; 17(2):215-26. PubMed ID: 7285594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interhemispheric asymmetry in facial expression recognition: relationship to field-dependence.
    Manning L
    Cortex; 1986 Dec; 22(4):601-10. PubMed ID: 3816244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Field dependence and lateralization of verbal and configurational processing.
    Zoccolotti P; Oltman PK
    Cortex; 1978 Jun; 14(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 679696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Involvement of low-level visual areas in hemispheric superiority for face processing.
    Sung YW; Someya Y; Eriko Y; Choi SH; Cho ZH; Ogawa S
    Brain Res; 2011 May; 1390():118-25. PubMed ID: 21443866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differences in visual attention and task interference between males and females reflect differences in brain laterality.
    Davidson H; Cave KR; Sellner D
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(4):508-19. PubMed ID: 10683401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hemispheric asymmetry in face perception tasks of different cognitive requirement.
    Marzi CA; Tassinari G; Tressoldi PE; Barry C; Grabowska A
    Hum Neurobiol; 1985; 4(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 3997584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The independence of face identity and facial expression recognition mechanisms: relationship to sex and cognitive style.
    Pizzamiglio L; Zoccolotti P; Mammucari A; Cesaroni R
    Brain Cogn; 1983 Apr; 2(2):176-88. PubMed ID: 6546021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Absence of any developmental trend in right hemisphere superiority for face recognition.
    Young AW; Bion PJ
    Cortex; 1980 Aug; 16(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 7471762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The asymmetry of the fusiform face area is a stable individual characteristic that underlies the left-visual-field superiority for faces.
    Yovel G; Tambini A; Brandman T
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Nov; 46(13):3061-8. PubMed ID: 18639566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual-field superiority as a function of stimulus type and content.
    Dutta T; Mandal MK
    Int J Neurosci; 2002 Aug; 112(8):945-52. PubMed ID: 12448834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Opposite visual hemifield superiorities in face recognition as a function of cognitive style.
    Rapaczynski W; Ehrlichman H
    Neuropsychologia; 1979; 17(6):645-52. PubMed ID: 522978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Hemispheric differences in letter matching of hiragana and katakana].
    Iizuka K; Sato H
    Ann Physiol Anthropol; 1992 Jul; 11(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 1388406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hemispheric effects of canonical views of category members with known typicality levels.
    Zaidel DW; Kosta A
    Brain Cogn; 2001; 46(1-2):311-6. PubMed ID: 11527357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tachistoscopic recognition of Kana and Hangul words, handedness and shift of laterality difference.
    Shimizu A; Endo M
    Neuropsychologia; 1981; 19(5):665-73. PubMed ID: 7312151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early versus late stages of processing and their relation to functional hemispheric asymmetries in face recognition.
    Moscovitch M; Scullion D; Christie D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 Aug; 2(3):401-16. PubMed ID: 993745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sex differences in hemispheric asymmetry revisited.
    Hannay HJ; Boyer CL
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Aug; 47(1):315-21. PubMed ID: 704258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex differences in face processing: Are women less lateralized and faster than men?
    Godard O; Fiori N
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):167-75. PubMed ID: 20621740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dual-task interference patterns reveal differential processing of upright and inverted faces.
    Hillis SK; Hiscock M; Rexer JL
    Brain Cogn; 1995 Jul; 28(2):155-72. PubMed ID: 7546670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sex and visual field effects on accuracy and decision making when subjects classify male and female faces.
    Jones B
    Cortex; 1979 Dec; 15(4):551-60. PubMed ID: 548219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Left visual field superiority in a letter-naming task for both left- and right-handers.
    Bashore TR; Nydegger RV; Miller H
    Cortex; 1982 Jul; 18(2):245-55. PubMed ID: 7128173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.