213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7286172)
1. Abortions preventable by contraceptive practice.
Westoff CF; DeLung JS; Goldman N; Forrest JD
Fam Plann Perspect; 1981; 13(5):218-23. PubMed ID: 7286172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contraceptive use among U.S. women having abortions in 2000-2001.
Jones RK; Darroch JE; Henshaw SK
Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2002; 34(6):294-303. PubMed ID: 12558092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Observation: contraceptive method use following an abortion.
Henshaw SK
Fam Plann Perspect; 1984; 16(2):75-7. PubMed ID: 6723942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of traditional methods of contraception among Turkish couples.
Goldberg HI; Toros A
Stud Fam Plann; 1994; 25(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 8059445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion in the framework of family planning in Estonia.
Karro H
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl; 1997; 164():46-50. PubMed ID: 9225637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Demographic and social characteristics of family planning acceptors in Jordan.
Sahawneh F
Popul Bull ECWA; 1982; (22-23):119-36. PubMed ID: 12266313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The relevance of ethnic monitoring in the experience of Haringey Healthcare NHS trust community family planning clinics.
Christopher E
Br J Fam Plann; 1999 Jan; 24(4):123-7. PubMed ID: 10023096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of women's employment and education on contraceptive use and abortion in Kinshasa, Zaire.
Shapiro D; Tambashe BO
Stud Fam Plann; 1994; 25(2):96-110. PubMed ID: 8059449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring contraceptive use patterns among teenage and adult women.
Glei DA
Fam Plann Perspect; 1999; 31(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 10224545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures.
Forrest JD; Samara R
Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(5):188-95. PubMed ID: 8886761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Weighing risks against benefits in contraceptive safety.
Akhter HH
Draper Fund Rep; 1983 Aug; (12):20-2. PubMed ID: 12338977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contraceptive knowledge, attitudes, and practice in Russia during the 1980s.
Popov AA; Visser AP; Ketting E
Stud Fam Plann; 1993; 24(4):227-35. PubMed ID: 8212092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Women's contraceptive attitudes and use in 1992.
Forrest JD; Fordyce RR
Fam Plann Perspect; 1993; 25(4):175-9. PubMed ID: 8405344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of recent policy changes on fertility, abortion, and contraceptive use in Romania.
Serbanescu F; Morris L; Stupp P; Stanescu A
Stud Fam Plann; 1995; 26(2):76-87. PubMed ID: 7618197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors determining the choice of contraceptive methods at the Family Planning Clinic, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Konje JC; Oladini F; Otolorin EO; Ladipo OO
Br J Fam Plann; 1998 Oct; 24(3):107-10. PubMed ID: 9855717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Depo Provera. Position paper on clinical use, effectiveness and side effects.
Bigrigg A; Evans M; Gbolade B; Newton J; Pollard L; Szarewski A; Thomas C; Walling M
Br J Fam Plann; 1999 Jul; 25(2):69-76. PubMed ID: 10454658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Choice at any cost.
Jacobson JL
World Watch; 1988; 1(2):30-8. PubMed ID: 12281497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contraceptive development and better family planning.
Segal SJ
Bull N Y Acad Med; 1996; 73(1):92-104. PubMed ID: 8804742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors affecting the use and non use of contraception.
Utomo B; Alimoeso S; Park CB
Majalah Demografi Indones; 1983 Dec; 10(20):ii-19-48. PubMed ID: 12280177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stalking the elusive "unmet need" for family planning.
Dixon-Mueller R; Germain A
Stud Fam Plann; 1992; 23(5):330-5. PubMed ID: 1475801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
