These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7290018)

  • 21. [Accuracy of diameter measurement in vitro using automated software for CT angiography: effect of convolution kernels].
    Suzuki S; Kaminaga T; Yamauchi T; Furui S; Ajiro Y
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Jan; 64(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 14994512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Comparison of quantitative coronary arteriography using cinefilm and digital images].
    Arai H; Sato H; Aizawa T; Watanabe H
    J Cardiol; 2001 May; 37(5):241-8. PubMed ID: 11392892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Three-dimensional graphics display of X-ray angiography data.
    Mol CR; Burridge JM; Morffew AJ
    Comput Biomed Res; 1986 Feb; 19(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 3753914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Intravenous arteriography using digital subtraction techniques.
    Brody WR; Enzmann DR; Miller DC; Guthaner DF; Pelc NJ; Keyes GS; Riederer SJ
    JAMA; 1982 Aug; 248(6):671-4. PubMed ID: 7047776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of a cinevideodensitometric method for measuring vessel dimensions from digitized angiograms.
    Nickoloff EL; Han J; Esser PD; Nichols AB
    Invest Radiol; 1987 Nov; 22(11):875-82. PubMed ID: 3429183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Computerized image analysis for quantitative measurement of vessel diameter from cineangiograms.
    Spears JR; Sandor T; Als AV; Malagold M; Markis JE; Grossman W; Serur JR; Paulin S
    Circulation; 1983 Aug; 68(2):453-61. PubMed ID: 6861322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quantitative coronary angiography using image recovery techniques for background estimation in unsubtracted images.
    Wong JT; Kamyar F; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):4003-15. PubMed ID: 17985646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A new method to assess the fluidodynamic behaviour of an angiographic contrast agent.
    Novario R; Tanzi F; Bianchi C; Lorusso R; Goddi A; Vermiglio G; Conte L
    Radiol Med; 2002 Apr; 103(4):396-406. PubMed ID: 12107390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Vascular diameter measurement in CT angiography: comparison of model-based iterative reconstruction and standard filtered back projection algorithms in vitro.
    Suzuki S; Machida H; Tanaka I; Ueno E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):652-7. PubMed ID: 23436858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Computer processed fluoroscopic images for digital intravenous renal angiography.
    Strauss LG; Busch HP; Prager P; Hartmann H; Müller W; Clorius JH; Lorenz WJ; Georgi M
    Eur J Radiol; 1986 Feb; 6(1):78-81. PubMed ID: 3516702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. X-ray imaging technique for in vitro tissue composition measurements using saline/iodine displacement: experimental verification.
    Moreau M; Dunmore-Buyze PJ; Holdsworth DW; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 1997 Mar; 24(3):351-60. PubMed ID: 9089586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Performance of the K-edge digital subtraction angiography imaging system at the European synchrotron radiation facility.
    Peterzol A; Bravin A; Coan P; Elleaume H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):44-9. PubMed ID: 16461532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. CT angiography: in vitro comparison of five reconstruction methods.
    Addis KA; Hopper KD; Iyriboz TA; Liu Y; Wise SW; Kasales CJ; Blebea JS; Mauger DT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Nov; 177(5):1171-6. PubMed ID: 11641196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A real vessel phantom for imaging experimentation.
    Dabrowski W; Dunmore-Buyze J; Rankin RN; Holdsworth DW; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 1997 May; 24(5):687-93. PubMed ID: 9167159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Geometrical accuracy and fusion of multimodal vascular images: a phantom study.
    Boussion N; Soulez G; De Guise JA; Daronat M; Qin Z; Cloutier G
    Med Phys; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1434-43. PubMed ID: 15259646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of observer performance in detecting blood vessels on simulated angiographic images.
    Sandor TS; Swensson RG
    Med Phys; 1978; 5(5):380-6. PubMed ID: 713971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Digital subtraction angiography of the coronary arteries.
    Neeley JP; Vannier MW; Gutierrez FR; Spadaro JJ
    Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1985; 25(1):23-60. PubMed ID: 3902366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. CT angiography with volume rendering for quantifying vascular stenoses: in vitro validation of accuracy.
    Kuszyk BS; Heath DG; Johnson PT; Eng J; Fishman EK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Aug; 173(2):449-55. PubMed ID: 10430152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Resolving power of digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Measurements of opacification with different blood vessel calibers and constrictions in relation to contrast media concentration].
    Schultz E; Fischer P
    Rofo; 1983 Sep; 139(3):296-9. PubMed ID: 6411550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Phantom study to evaluate contrast-medium-enhanced digital subtraction mammography with a full-field indirect-detection system.
    Palma BA; Rosado-Méndez I; Villaseñor Y; Brandan ME
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):577-89. PubMed ID: 20229866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.