These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 729067)
1. [Signifivance of sole dermatoglyphics and of foot length in the accurate determination of gestational age in newborn infants]. Vocel J; Marková H Cesk Pediatr; 1978 Oct; 33(10):618-20. PubMed ID: 729067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Using computer vision to help the determination of the gestational age of newborns. Bellon OR; Cat MN; Silva L; Boyer KL Acad Radiol; 2005 May; 12(5):544-53. PubMed ID: 15866126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Plantar creasing and assessment of gestational age of the newborn (author's transl)]. Bartl W; Hauser G Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1981 Nov; 93(21):673-6. PubMed ID: 7324481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Clinical discussion: dermatoglyphics of the foot of newborn infants]. Okajima M; Abe T; Nagahashi C; Yoshihara T; Sugiyama S Sanfujinka No Jissai; 1972 Mar; 21(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 5068145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Proposed identification of newborn infants on the basis of foot dermatoglyphics]. Gebala A; Grzeszyk C; Dobrzańska A; Walkiewicz T Pediatr Pol; 1969 May; 44(5):619-24. PubMed ID: 5791329 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Biparietal diameter: a useful measure for determining gestational age of human abortuses. Sailaja K; Ahuja RK; Gopinath G Natl Med J India; 1996; 9(4):165-7. PubMed ID: 8772333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sternum length, torso length, and internipple distance in newborn infants. Sivan Y; Merlob P; Reisner SH Pediatrics; 1983 Oct; 72(4):523-5. PubMed ID: 6889066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Documentation of plantar dermatoglyphics for the identification of newborn infants]. Wolff CH Zentralbl Gynakol; 1971 Oct; 93(41):1426-31. PubMed ID: 5145185 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A simple method of assessment of gestational age in newborn infants. Narayanan I; Dua K; Gujral VV; Mehta DK; Mathew M; Prabhakar AK Pediatrics; 1982 Jan; 69(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 7054757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Results of a standard value determination concerning newborn infants in the German Democratic Republic. III. Morphologic assessment of maturity]. Plesse R; Adomssent S; Kruse HJ; Löscher H; Herre HD Zentralbl Gynakol; 1975; 97(18):1089-98. PubMed ID: 1189782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Values for foot length in newborns. Kulkarni ML; Rajendran NK Indian Pediatr; 1992 Apr; 29(4):507-9. PubMed ID: 1506106 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Limitations of footprinting as a means of infant identification. Shepard KS; Erickson T; Fromm H Pediatrics; 1966 Jan; 37(1):107-8. PubMed ID: 5948147 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. 'Foot length'--a newer approach in neonatal anthropometry. Mathur A; Tak SK; Kothari P J Trop Pediatr; 1984 Dec; 30(6):333-6. PubMed ID: 6520902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Foot length measurement from foot print for identifying a newborn at risk. Daga SR; Daga AS; Patole S; Kadam S; Mukadam Y J Trop Pediatr; 1988 Feb; 34(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 3346935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Fetal femur length, neonatal crown-heel length, and screening for intrauterine growth retardation. Ott WJ Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Apr; 65(4):460-4. PubMed ID: 3885101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lower limb standards in newborns. Merlob P; Sivan Y; Reisner SH Am J Dis Child; 1984 Feb; 138(2):140-2. PubMed ID: 6695869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Embryological development of human palmar, plantar, and digital flexion creases. Kimura S; Kitagawa T Anat Rec; 1986 Oct; 216(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 3777451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Ectodermal criteria for the clinical determination of maturity in newborn infants]. Gleiss J; Hermanns M Arch Kinderheilkd; 1969 Sep; 179(3):266-83. PubMed ID: 5350791 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]