These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

40 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7291519)

  • 1. Contrast and latitude of CT hard copy: an ROC study.
    Warren RC
    Radiology; 1981 Oct; 141(1):139-45. PubMed ID: 7291519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of X-ray film and photographic paper in recording CT images.
    Stephenson TF; Lincoln AJ; Mehnert PJ; Paul GJ
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1984 Dec; 8(6):1161-3. PubMed ID: 6501624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Hard-copy (film) versus soft-copy (CRT) reading performance between compressed and uncompressed images: SOLs in abdominal CT images].
    Ando Y; Tsukamoto N; Kawaguchi O; Kitamura M; Kunieda E; Kubo A; Ogasawara K; Kinosada Y; Maeda T; Kozuka T
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1999 Sep; 59(11):521-5. PubMed ID: 10536448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital chest radiography: effect on diagnostic accuracy of hard copy, conventional video, and reversed gray scale video display formats.
    MacMahon H; Metz CE; Doi K; Kim T; Giger ML; Chan HP
    Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):669-73. PubMed ID: 3406396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Size discrimination in computed tomographic images. Effects of feature contrast and display window.
    Seltzer SE; Swensson RG; Judy PF; Nawfel RD
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Jun; 23(6):455-62. PubMed ID: 3403205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characteristics and control of contrast in CT.
    Barnes JE
    Radiographics; 1992 Jul; 12(4):825-37. PubMed ID: 1636042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Liver lesions: manganese-enhanced MR and dual-phase helical CT for preoperative detection and characterization comparison with receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Braga HJ; Choti MA; Lee VS; Paulson EK; Siegelman ES; Bluemke DA
    Radiology; 2002 May; 223(2):525-31. PubMed ID: 11997563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Wavelet based noise reduction in CT-images using correlation analysis.
    Borsdorf A; Raupach R; Flohr T; Hornegger J
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Dec; 27(12):1685-703. PubMed ID: 19033085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiologists' productivity in the interpretation of CT scans: a comparison of PACS with conventional film.
    Reiner BI; Siegel EL; Hooper FJ; Pomerantz S; Dahlke A; Rallis D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Apr; 176(4):861-4. PubMed ID: 11264065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Image quality of paper prints compared to film copies in CT investigations].
    Bley T; Burger D; Ghanem N; Thürl C; Saueressig U; Kotter E; Langer M
    Rofo; 2002 Apr; 174(4):423-5. PubMed ID: 11960403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro perception of low-contrast features in digital, film, and digitized dental radiographs: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Grassl U; Schulze RK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):694-701. PubMed ID: 17466887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of film-based versus filmless operation on the productivity of CT technologists.
    Reiner BI; Siegel EL; Hooper FJ; Glasser D
    Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):481-5. PubMed ID: 9577498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Receiver operating characteristic curves in the evaluation of hard copies of computed tomography scans.
    Ritchings RT; Isherwood I; Pullan BR; Kingsley D
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1979 Jun; 3(3):423-5. PubMed ID: 438389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of paper print and soft copy reading in plain paediatric radiographs.
    Maydell AT; Andronikou S; Ackermann C; Bezuidenhout AF
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Oct; 53(5):459-66. PubMed ID: 19788481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Monte Carlo simulation study of the effect of energy windows in computed tomography images based on an energy-resolved photon counting detector.
    Lee SW; Choi YN; Cho HM; Lee YJ; Ryu HJ; Kim HJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Aug; 57(15):4931-49. PubMed ID: 22800966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners.
    Kinahan PE; Hasegawa BH; Beyer T
    Semin Nucl Med; 2003 Jul; 33(3):166-79. PubMed ID: 12931319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiation dose reduction for chest CT with non-linear adaptive filters.
    Singh S; Digumarthy SR; Back A; Shepard JA; Kalra MK
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Mar; 54(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 23185071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A ROC analysis for comparing contrast perception in grey scale reversal of digital images].
    Dölken W; Krahe T; Landwehr P; Horwitz AE; Lackner K
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Jan; 1(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 2018803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multidetector CT: what do we do with all the images generated?
    Strickland NH
    Br J Radiol; 2004; 77 Spec No 1():S14-9. PubMed ID: 15546837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.