96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7291538)
1. The effect of varying spatial resolution on the detectability of diffuse pulmonary nodules. Assessment with digitized conventional radiographs.
Foley WD; Wilson CR; Keyes GS; DiBianca FA; Scanlon GT; Schleuter D; Lawson TL
Radiology; 1981 Oct; 141(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 7291538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The diagnosis of pulmonary nodules: comparison between standard and inverse digitized images and conventional chest radiographs.
Sheline ME; Brikman I; Epstein DM; Mezrich JL; Kundel HL; Arenson RL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Feb; 152(2):261-3. PubMed ID: 2783501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of image processing on nodule detection rates in digitized chest radiographs: ROC study of observer performance.
Sherrier RH; Chiles C; Wilkinson WE; Johnson GA; Ravin CE
Radiology; 1988 Feb; 166(2):447-50. PubMed ID: 3336719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison of digital radiography and conventional X-ray in the diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodule with receiver operating characteristic analysis].
Duan G; Chen WG; Wang JY; Huang XH; Wang Y; Lu W
Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao; 2003 Jun; 23(6):621-3. PubMed ID: 12810395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved detection of subtle lung nodules by use of chest radiographs with bone suppression imaging: receiver operating characteristic analysis with and without localization.
Li F; Hara T; Shiraishi J; Engelmann R; MacMahon H; Doi K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 May; 196(5):W535-41. PubMed ID: 21512042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spatial resolution requirements for digital chest radiographs: an ROC study of observer performance in selected cases.
Lams PM; Cocklin ML
Radiology; 1986 Jan; 158(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 3940365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conventional chest radiography vs dual-energy computed radiography in the detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules.
Kelcz F; Zink FE; Peppler WW; Kruger DG; Ergun DL; Mistretta CA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 8310908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differentiation of benign from malignant pulmonary nodules with digitized chest radiographs.
Sherrier RH; Chiles C; Johnson GA; Ravin CE
Radiology; 1987 Mar; 162(3):645-9. PubMed ID: 3809476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-aided diagnosis of pulmonary nodules: results of a large-scale observer test.
MacMahon H; Engelmann R; Behlen FM; Hoffmann KR; Ishida T; Roe C; Metz CE; Doi K
Radiology; 1999 Dec; 213(3):723-6. PubMed ID: 10580945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selenium-based digital radiography versus high-resolution storage phosphor radiography in the detection of solitary pulmonary nodules without calcification: receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
Awai K; Komi M; Hori S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Nov; 177(5):1141-4. PubMed ID: 11641189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Distinguishing benign from malignant pulmonary nodules by gradient analysis of digitized chest radiographs].
Kuriyama K; Sato T; Kumatani Y; Matsugi S; Hiruma O; Kadowaki K; Narumi Y; Fujita M; Fujino ; Doi O
Rinsho Hoshasen; 1989 Jan; 34(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 2724611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved pulmonary nodule detection with scanning equalization radiography.
Wandtke JC; Plewes DB; McFaul JA
Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3420264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Liquid-crystal display monitors and cathode-ray tube monitors: a comparison of observer performance in the detection of small solitary pulmonary nodules.
Hwang SA; Seo JB; Choi BK; Do KH; Ko SM; Lee SH; Lee JS; Song JW; Song KS; Lim TH
Korean J Radiol; 2003; 4(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 14530643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Digital image intensifier radiography and film-screen combinations in pulmonary nodules].
Dölken W; Krahe T; Landwehr P; Jenett M
Rofo; 1989 Aug; 151(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 2548236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital chest radiography: comparison of unprocessed and processed images in the detection of solitary pulmonary nodules.
Correa J; Souto M; Tahoces PG; Malagari KS; Tucker DM; Larkin JJ; Kuhlman J; Barnes GT; Zerhouni EA; Fraser RG
Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):253-8. PubMed ID: 7892481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology: a simulated nodule detection study.
Kool LJ; Busscher DL; Vlasbloem H; Hermans J; vd Merwe PC; Algra PR; Herstel W
Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 3420280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of chest image interpretation with conventional, laser-printed, and high-resolution workstation images.
Slasky BS; Gur D; Good WF; Costa-Greco MA; Harris KM; Cooperstein LA; Rockette HE
Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):775-80. PubMed ID: 2305061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of a digital image database for chest radiographs with and without a lung nodule: receiver operating characteristic analysis of radiologists' detection of pulmonary nodules.
Shiraishi J; Katsuragawa S; Ikezoe J; Matsumoto T; Kobayashi T; Komatsu K; Matsui M; Fujita H; Kodera Y; Doi K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 10628457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of 2048-line digital display formats and conventional radiographs: an ROC study.
Hayrapetian A; Aberle DR; Huang HK; Fiske R; Morioka C; Valentino D; Boechat MI
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 May; 152(5):1113-8. PubMed ID: 2705346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Quantitative analysis of clinical usefulness of CRT monitor diagnosis by using previous and current chest images with simulated lung nodules].
Sasaki Y; Katsuragawa S; Yoneda Y; Takeda S; Yanagisawa T
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Apr; 56(5):275-8. PubMed ID: 8692651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
