115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7294235)
21. Testing competency in psychiatric patients.
Stanley B; Stanley M
IRB; 1982 Oct; 4(8):1-6. PubMed ID: 11651689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. In harm's way: research subjects who are decisionally impaired.
Sundram CJ
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):36-65. PubMed ID: 15573429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Informed consent in psychiatric research.
Roth LH; Appelbaum PS; Lidz CW; Benson P; Winslade WJ
Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):425-41. PubMed ID: 11659013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Uninformed decisionmaking. The case of surrogate research consent.
Haimowitz S; Delano SJ; Oldham JM
Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(6):9-16. PubMed ID: 9474489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Competence and consent to research: a critique of the recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission.
Appelbaum PS
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):265-76. PubMed ID: 11658181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Problems of informed consent for clinical trials in psychiatry.
Helmchen H
Control Clin Trials; 1981 May; 1(4):435-40. PubMed ID: 7261635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Ethical parameters of challenge studies inducing psychosis with ketamine.
Tishler CL; Gordon LB
Ethics Behav; 1999; 9(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 11657272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Probing informed consent in schizophrenia research.
Stephenson J
JAMA; 1999 Jun 23-30; 281(24):2273-4. PubMed ID: 10386540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Questions and answers.
Goodwin FK
J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 11653321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. "Evaluation of human subject protections in schizophrenia research conducted by the University of ..." (Part IV).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Feb; 15(2):5-6. PubMed ID: 11660762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Medical ethics in the dock.
N Y Times Web; 1994 Mar; ():A16. PubMed ID: 11647023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Critical ethical issues and conflicts.
Lazarus J
J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 11653309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. When the subjects are hospital staff, is it ethical (or possible) to get informed consent?
Geller JL; Lidz CW; Pattulo EL
IRB; 1987; 9(5):4-8. PubMed ID: 11649898
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Achieving proper balance in research with decisionally-incapacitated subjects: NAMI's perspectives on the working group's proposal.
Flynn LM; Honberg RS
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):174-92. PubMed ID: 15573436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Patients' competence to consent to neurobiological research.
Appelbaum PS
Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):241-51. PubMed ID: 11654519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The forum. Respecting and protecting mentally impaired persons in medical research.
Fisher CB
Ethics Behav; 2002; 12(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 12656072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Institutional review boards and research on individuals with mental disorders.
Hoppe SK
Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):187-95. PubMed ID: 11654514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The therapeutic misconception: informed consent in psychiatric research.
Appelbaum PS; Roth LH; Lidz C
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1982; 5(3-4):319-29. PubMed ID: 6135666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Regulation of research on the decisionally impaired: history and gaps in the current regulatory system.
Moreno JD
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 15573427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Participant protection with the use of records: ethical issues and recommendations.
Leigh WA
Ethics Behav; 1998; 8(4):305-19. PubMed ID: 11660540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
