These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7297100)

  • 21. The influence of stimulus size on measured visual field extent in infants.
    Dobson V; Baldwin MB; Mohan KM; Delaney SM; Harvey EM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Oct; 80(10):698-702. PubMed ID: 14560120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [A dissociation of thresholds between Goldmann kinetic perimetry and high-pass resolution perimetry in retinitis pigmentosa].
    Tokuhisa T; Oyama K; Tamaki R; Kitahara K
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Nov; 96(11):1429-32. PubMed ID: 1476073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Planimetric evaluation of kinetic perimetry with the Goldman perimeter (author's transl)].
    Niesel P
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1982 Jan; 180(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 7077988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quantitation of glaucomatous visual field defects with the Mark II Friedmann analyzer.
    Hicks BC; Anderson DR
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1983 May; 95(5):692-700. PubMed ID: 6846460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Visual fields in 4- to 10-year-old children using Goldmann and double-arc perimeters.
    Quinn GE; Fea AM; Minguini N
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 1991; 28(6):314-9. PubMed ID: 1757855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Functional field score: the effect of using a Goldmann V-4e isopter instead of a Goldmann III-4e isopter.
    Langelaan M; Wouters B; Moll AC; de Boer MR; van Rens GH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 May; 47(5):1817-23. PubMed ID: 16638986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of kinetic programs in various automated perimeters.
    Hashimoto S; Matsumoto C; Eura M; Okuyama S; Shimomura Y
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jul; 61(4):299-306. PubMed ID: 28444485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The perimetry of the blind spot. A comparison of kinetic and static, computerized stratgies].
    Gramer E; Pröll M; Krieglstein GK
    Ophthalmologica; 1979; 179(4):201-8. PubMed ID: 548856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A simulator for teaching visual field techniques on Goldmann or Goldmann-type perimeters.
    Hass I; Drance SM; Fairclough M
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1979 Aug; 88(2):259-60. PubMed ID: 474698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Increased visual field area with antireflective coated lenses in the presence of glare.
    Kirkham TH; Coupland SG
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1981 Jul; 16(3):141-4. PubMed ID: 7296362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Comparison of SKP (semi-automated kinetic perimetry) and SASP (suprathreshold automated static perimetry) techniques in patients with advanced glaucoma].
    Nowomiejska K; Paetzold J; Krapp E; Rejdak R; Zagórski Z; Schiefer U
    Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(1-2 Suppl):231-3. PubMed ID: 15510509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Visual field assessment in glaucoma: comparative evaluation of manual kinetic Goldmann perimetry and automated static perimetry.
    Agarwal HC; Gulati V; Sihota R
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2000 Dec; 48(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 11340889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The normal age-corrected and reaction time-corrected isopter derived by semi-automated kinetic perimetry.
    Vonthein R; Rauscher S; Paetzold J; Nowomiejska K; Krapp E; Hermann A; Sadowski B; Chaumette C; Wild JM; Schiefer U
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Jun; 114(6):1065-72. PubMed ID: 17331580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Computerized visual field screening in the management of patients with ocular hypertension.
    Dyster-Aas K; Heijl A; Lundgvist L
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1980 Dec; 58(6):918-928. PubMed ID: 7331777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The limitations of kinetic perimetry in early scotoma detection.
    Portney GL; Krohn MA
    Ophthalmology; 1978 Mar; 85(3):287-93. PubMed ID: 662282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison between semiautomated kinetic perimetry and conventional Goldmann manual kinetic perimetry in advanced visual field loss.
    Nowomiejska K; Vonthein R; Paetzold J; Zagorski Z; Kardon R; Schiefer U
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Aug; 112(8):1343-54. PubMed ID: 15996734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Development of a new fully automated kinetic algorithm (program k) for detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Hashimoto S; Matsumoto C; Okuyama S; Takada S; Arimura-Koike E; Shimomura Y
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Mar; 56(3):2092-9. PubMed ID: 25744980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical applicability of the Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimeter in children with and without visual impairment.
    Simkin SK; Misra SL; Kasture A; McGhee CN; Dai S
    Clin Exp Optom; 2019 Jan; 102(1):70-78. PubMed ID: 29938834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of manual kinetic and automated static perimetry in obtaining ptosis fields.
    Riemann CD; Hanson S; Foster JA
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2000 Jan; 118(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 10636416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Crowding of the peripheral nasal isopters in glaucoma.
    de Oliveira Rassi M; Shields MB
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1982 Jul; 94(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 7091280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.