These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7297784)

  • 1. Effects of dichotic/diotic versus monotic presentation on speech understanding in noise in elderly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kaplan H; Pickett JM
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(5):202-7. PubMed ID: 7297784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differences in speech discrimination in the elderly as a function of type of competing noise: speech-babble or cafeteria.
    Kaplan H; Pickett JM
    Audiology; 1982; 21(4):325-33. PubMed ID: 7103839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency resolution for diotic and dichotic listening conditions compared using the bandlimiting measure and a modified bandlimiting measure.
    Cokely JA; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1331-9. PubMed ID: 2030220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Release from first-formant masking in presbyacusis.
    Kaplan H; Pickett JM
    Audiology; 1984; 23(2):165-80. PubMed ID: 6721788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cues for Diotic and Dichotic Detection of a 500-Hz Tone in Noise Vary with Hearing Loss.
    Mao J; Koch KJ; Doherty KA; Carney LH
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Aug; 16(4):507-21. PubMed ID: 25976088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nonsense-syllable recognition in noise using monaural and binaural listening strategies.
    Arsenault MD; Punch JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Mar; 105(3):1821-30. PubMed ID: 10089605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The discrimination of samples of noise in monotic, diotic, and dichotic conditions.
    Heller LM; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jun; 97(6):3775-81. PubMed ID: 7790655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How difficult is difficult? Speech perception in noise in the elderly hearing impaired.
    Lavie L; Banai K; Attias J; Karni A
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2014 Sep; 25(3):313-6. PubMed ID: 25153230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diotic and Antiphasic Digits-in-noise Testing as a Hearing Screening and Triage Tool to Classify Type of Hearing Loss.
    De Sousa KC; Smits C; Moore DR; Myburgh HC; Swanepoel W
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):1037-1048. PubMed ID: 34799493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of stimulus material on the dichotic listening performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Speaks C; Niccum N; Van Tasell D
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Mar; 28(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 3981993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Signal detectability in the presence of monotic or dichotic noise bands of equal or unequal levels.
    Stillman JA; Irwin RJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Mar; 47(3):281-90. PubMed ID: 2326150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory detection, discrimination and speech processing in ageing, noise-sensitive and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Abel SM; Krever EM; Alberti PW
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 2336540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comodulation masking release in subjects with unilateral and bilateral hearing impairment.
    Moore BC; Shailer MJ; Hall JW; Schooneveldt GP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jan; 93(1):435-51. PubMed ID: 8423260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences in auditory performance between monaural and dichotic conditions. I: masking thresholds in frozen noise.
    Langhans A; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3456-70. PubMed ID: 1619122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech-reception threshold in noise with one and two hearing aids.
    Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):465-71. PubMed ID: 3950200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Binaural Interaction Effects of 30-50 Hz Auditory Steady State Responses.
    Gransier R; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e305-e315. PubMed ID: 28358747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving Sensitivity of the Digits-In-Noise Test Using Antiphasic Stimuli.
    De Sousa KC; Swanepoel W; Moore DR; Myburgh HC; Smits C
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):442-450. PubMed ID: 31425362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Impairment on Asynchronous Glimpsing of Speech.
    Ozmeral EJ; Buss E; Hall JW
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0154920. PubMed ID: 27144601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diotic loudness summation in normal and impaired hearing.
    Hall JW; Harvey AD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Sep; 28(3):445-8. PubMed ID: 4046585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification of synthetic /bdg/ by hearing-impaired listeners under monotic and dichotic formant presentation.
    Van de Grift Turek S; Dorman MF; Franks JR; Summerfield Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Mar; 67(3):1031-40. PubMed ID: 7358910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.