These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7300279)

  • 1. Effect of noise and reverberation on binaural and monaural word identification by subjects with various audiograms.
    Nabelek AK; Mason D
    J Speech Hear Res; 1981 Sep; 24(3):375-83. PubMed ID: 7300279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Listeners who prefer monaural to binaural hearing aids.
    Carter AS; Noe CM; Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 May; 12(5):261-72. PubMed ID: 11392438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term effects of monaural, binaural and no amplification in subjects with bilateral hearing loss.
    Gelfand SA; Silman S; Ross L
    Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(4):201-7. PubMed ID: 3438702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Binaural and monaural speech discrimination under reverberation.
    Gelfand SA; Hochberg I
    Audiology; 1976; 15(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 1252192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Binaural dichotic presentation to reduce the effects of spectral masking in moderate bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kulkarni PN; Pandey PC; Jangamashetti DS
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Apr; 51(4):334-44. PubMed ID: 22201526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aging and the binaural advantage in reverberation and noise.
    Helfer KS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Dec; 35(6):1394-401. PubMed ID: 1494281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Binaural cues and consonant perception in reverberation and noise.
    Helfer KS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Apr; 37(2):429-38. PubMed ID: 8028325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Signal-to-noise ratio advantage of binaural hearing aids and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation.
    Hawkins DB; Yacullo WS
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1984 Aug; 49(3):278-86. PubMed ID: 6748623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance-intensity functions as a predictor for binaural amplification.
    Mueller HG; Grimes AM; Jerome JJ
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(5):211-4. PubMed ID: 7297786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of amplification on the discrimination of dichotic consonant-vowel syllables in a population with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Jacobson JT; McCandless GA; Mahoney TM
    Audiology; 1979; 18(6):522-36. PubMed ID: 526197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differences in speech discrimination in the elderly as a function of type of competing noise: speech-babble or cafeteria.
    Kaplan H; Pickett JM
    Audiology; 1982; 21(4):325-33. PubMed ID: 7103839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reverberation as a parameter in clinical testing.
    Nábĕlek AK; Robinette L
    Audiology; 1978; 17(3):239-59. PubMed ID: 666659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation method for hearing aid fitting under reverberation: comparison between monaural and binaural hearing aids.
    Shiraishi K; Inoue M; Yonemoto K; Imamura A
    J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci; 2004 Nov; 23(6):255-8. PubMed ID: 15599071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of dichotic/diotic versus monotic presentation on speech understanding in noise in elderly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kaplan H; Pickett JM
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(5):202-7. PubMed ID: 7297784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monaural vs binaural speech reception threshold and word discrimination scores in the hearing impaired.
    Siegenthaler BM; Craig CH
    J Aud Res; 1981 Apr; 21(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 7052803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monaural and binaural speech perception in reverberation for listeners of various ages.
    Nábĕlek AK; Robinson PK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 May; 71(5):1242-8. PubMed ID: 7085996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of vowels in quiet, noise, and reverberation: relationships with age and hearing loss.
    Nábĕlek AK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Aug; 84(2):476-84. PubMed ID: 3170940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of reverberation and masker fluctuations on binaural unmasking of speech.
    George EL; Festen JM; Goverts ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1581-91. PubMed ID: 22978887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.