These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7300287)

  • 1. Construct validity of direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of speech intelligibility: evidence from a study of the hearing impaired.
    Schiavetti N; Metz DE; Sitler RW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1981 Sep; 24(3):441-5. PubMed ID: 7300287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of stuttering severity.
    Schiavetti N; Sacco PR; Metz DE; Sitler RW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Dec; 26(4):568-73. PubMed ID: 6366371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scaling and transcription measures of intelligibility for populations with disordered speech.
    Tye-Murray N; Barkmeier J; Folkins JW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Jun; 34(3):697-702. PubMed ID: 2072696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability, sensitivity and validity of magnitude estimation, category scaling and paired-comparison judgements of speech intelligibility by older listeners.
    Purdy SC; Pavlovic CV
    Audiology; 1992; 31(5):254-71. PubMed ID: 1482505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: vowel intelligibility for normal-hearing listeners.
    Ferguson SH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2365-73. PubMed ID: 15532667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory temporal acuity of the hearing impaired and its relationship to speech intelligibility.
    Stoker RG
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 4(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 721669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.
    Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2336-47. PubMed ID: 19354408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of pleasantness and severity in dysphonic and normal speakers.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):3014-21. PubMed ID: 12509023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scaling of voice pleasantness and acceptability in tracheoesophageal speakers.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC
    J Voice; 2005 Sep; 19(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 16102664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Articulatory dimensions of hearing-impaired speakers' intelligibility: evidence from a time-related aerodynamic, acoustic, and electroglottographic study.
    Samar VJ; Metz DE; Schiavetti N; Sitler RW; Whitehead RL
    J Commun Disord; 1989 Aug; 22(4):243-64. PubMed ID: 2794107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sophisticated and naïve listeners' magnitude estimation scaling judgments of speech intelligibility and speech annoyance.
    Ellis LW; Fucci D
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Jun; 90(3 Pt 2):1231-4. PubMed ID: 10939074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Talker intelligibility differences in cochlear implant listeners.
    Green T; Katiri S; Faulkner A; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jun; 121(6):EL223-9. PubMed ID: 17552573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rasch analysis of word identification and magnitude estimation scaling responses in measuring naive listeners' judgments of speech intelligibility of children with severe-to-profound hearing impairments.
    Beltyukova SA; Stone GM; Ellis LW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1124-37. PubMed ID: 18664707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech intelligibility in noise: effects of fluency and hearing protector type.
    Abel SM; Alberti PW; Haythornthwaite C; Riko K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Mar; 71(3):708-15. PubMed ID: 7085974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of listeners' experience on two measures of intelligibility.
    Ellis LW; Fucci DJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Jun; 74(3 Pt 2):1099-104. PubMed ID: 1501975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of objective and subjective measures of speech intelligibility in elderly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Rivera IM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Aug; 34(4):904-15. PubMed ID: 1956197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acoustic and psychophysical dimensions of the perceived speech naturalness of nonstutterers and posttreatment stutterers.
    Metz DE; Schiavetti N; Sacco PR
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1990 Aug; 55(3):516-25. PubMed ID: 2381193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of equal-appearing interval scaling and direct magnitude estimation of nasal voice quality.
    Zraick RI; Liss JM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 43(4):979-88. PubMed ID: 11386483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnitude-estimation scaling of speech intelligibility: effects of listeners' experience and semantic-syntactic context.
    Ellis LW; Fucci DJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Aug; 73(1):295-305. PubMed ID: 1945708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm in normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
    Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():36-47. PubMed ID: 24495441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.