These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7301520)

  • 1. Dichotic sequence discrimination: the effect of stimulus intensity and background noise level.
    Babkoff H; Algom D; Eliashar S
    Percept Psychophys; 1981 Aug; 30(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 7301520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intensity discrimination of clicks: the effects of click bandwidth and background noise.
    Penner MJ; Viemeister NF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1973 Nov; 54(5):1184-8. PubMed ID: 4765804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On short and long auditory stores.
    Cowan N
    Psychol Bull; 1984 Sep; 96(2):341-70. PubMed ID: 6385047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of masking-spectrum slope and interaural phase on detection of tones.
    Sonn M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Jun; 38(3):776-84. PubMed ID: 4842432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intensity discrimination for noise bursts in the presence of a continuous, bandstop background: effects of level, width of the bandstop, and duration.
    Moore BC; Raab DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1975 Feb; 57(2):400-5. PubMed ID: 1117092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Binaural versus monaural loudness: supersummation of tone partially masked by noise.
    Marks LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jan; 81(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 3819169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trading of intensity and interaural coherence in dichotic pitch stimuli.
    Culling JF; Lewis HG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1908-14. PubMed ID: 20968362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intensity discrimination and loudness for tones in broadband noise.
    Schneider BA; Parker S
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Jan; 47(1):92-4. PubMed ID: 2300430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory sensory gating predicts acceptable noise level.
    Miller SE; Wathen K; Cash E; Pitts T; Cornell L
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():76-84. PubMed ID: 29325873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Asymmetry of masking between complex tones and noise: partial loudness.
    Gockel H; Moore BC; Patterson RD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):349-60. PubMed ID: 12880046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Loudness of sounds with a subcritical bandwidth: a challenge to current loudness models?
    Hots J; Rennies J; Verhey JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):EL334-9. PubMed ID: 24116539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual restoration of obliterated sounds.
    Warren RM
    Psychol Bull; 1984 Sep; 96(2):371-83. PubMed ID: 6385048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Forward acoustic masking enhances the auditory brainstem response in a diotic, but not dichotic, paradigm in salicylate-induced tinnitus.
    Liu XP; Chen L
    Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():51-60. PubMed ID: 25668125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory demonstrations on compact disk for large N.
    Hartmann WM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jan; 93(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 8423255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Unmasking in loudness matching and in forward-masking paradigms.
    Soderquist DR; Wilkes MR
    J Aud Res; 1980 Jul; 20(3):205-15. PubMed ID: 7347741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prior stimulation and the masking-level difference.
    Yost WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Sep; 78(3):901-7. PubMed ID: 4031260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intensity discrimination of noise in the presence of band-reject noise.
    Viemeister NF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1974 Nov; 56(5):1594-1600. PubMed ID: 4427030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stimulus intensity and loudness recruitment: neural correlates.
    Phillips DP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jul; 82(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 3305648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single-tone intensity discrimination based on auditory-nerve rate responses in backgrounds of quiet, noise, and with stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle.
    Winslow RL; Sachs MB
    Hear Res; 1988 Sep; 35(2-3):165-89. PubMed ID: 3198509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of contralateral broad-band noise on frequency discrimination.
    Labiak JM; Wilson WR
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1974; 77(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 4829051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.