These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7305784)

  • 1. A comparative trial of two urographic contrast media - Conray 420 and Urografin 370.
    Eyes BE; Evans AF; Whitehouse GH
    Australas Radiol; 1981 Jul; 25(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 7305784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Excretory urography--current indications of the status of a conventional diagnostic method. Status of nonionic and ionic contrast media].
    Porst H; Mayer R
    Fortschr Med; 1985 Aug; 103(30):755-8. PubMed ID: 4043912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The old and the new: a study of five contrast media for urography.
    Davies P; Panto PN; Buckley J; Richardson RE
    Br J Radiol; 1985 Jul; 58(691):593-7. PubMed ID: 3893610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Acute renal failure induced by radiologyic contrast media].
    Barrientos A; Gómez-Tejada E; Ruilope LM; Rodicio JL; Leiva O
    Actas Urol Esp; 1978; 2(3):115-8. PubMed ID: 676829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of iopamidol and diatrizoate in peripheral angiography.
    Fletcher EW
    Br J Radiol; 1982 Jan; 55(649):36-8. PubMed ID: 7032637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tubular lesions secondary to conventional urography: a study on renal biopsies by light microscopy.
    Stanziale P; Fuiano G; Balletta MM; Esposito A; Foscaldi A; Quaranta L; Andreucci VE
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 1987; 212():151-4. PubMed ID: 3618355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Iopamidol in urography. A comparison between ionic and nonionic contrast media in patients with normal and impaired renal function.
    Dalla Palma L; Rossi M; Stacul F; Agostini R
    Urol Radiol; 1982; 4(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 7101596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Iopamidol arteriography: discomfort and pain.
    Dotter CT; Rösch J; Erlandson M; Buschman RW; Ogilvie R
    Radiology; 1985 Jun; 155(3):819-21. PubMed ID: 3890014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advantages of nonionic contrast agents in adult urography.
    Dray RJ; Winfield AC; Muhletaler CA; Kirchner FK
    Urology; 1984 Sep; 24(3):297-9. PubMed ID: 6382739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Renal tubular damage after rapid intravenous contrast study with iopamidol].
    Stratta P; Porcellini G; Bianchi SD; Granone A; Gatti G; Salomone M; Ragni R
    Minerva Med; 1981 Jul; 72(28):1859-62. PubMed ID: 7254634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Femoral artery flow and pain during lumbar aortography: comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast media.
    Padayachee TS; Reidy JF; King DH; Reeves M; Gosling RG
    Clin Radiol; 1983 Jan; 34(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 6822042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Injection rate: a factor in contrast reactions?
    Duddy MJ; Manns RA; Wormald SA
    Clin Radiol; 1990 Jan; 41(1):42-3. PubMed ID: 2297966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pretreatment regimen for high-risk patients receiving urographic contrast media.
    Moskovitz B; Levin DR
    Eur Urol; 1988; 15(1-2):94-5. PubMed ID: 3215244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in left ventricular diastolic function after left ventriculography: a comparison with iopamidol and urografin.
    Tani M; Handa S; Noma S; Kojima S; Miyamori R; Miyazaki T; Yoshino H; Ohnishi S; Yamazaki H; Nakamura Y
    Am Heart J; 1985 Sep; 110(3):617-22. PubMed ID: 4036787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Physiological effect of contrast media on the urinary tract and the problems of interpretation of excretory urograms].
    Bosin VIu; Skripkina LA
    Ter Arkh; 1980; 52(7):88-91. PubMed ID: 7404421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative radiological studies of Uromiro and Urografin as contrast media for excretion urography.
    Adamali N; Raja R
    East Afr Med J; 1979 Nov; 56(11):593-6. PubMed ID: 520238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Urographic media; a study of the relative merits of urografin 60 per cent and hypaque 45 per cent.
    CABLE R
    J Fac Radiol; 1959 Apr; 10(2):100-2. PubMed ID: 24545251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A large trial of intravenous Conray 325 and Niopam 300 to assess immediate and delayed reactions.
    McCullough M; Davies P; Richardson R
    Br J Radiol; 1989 Mar; 62(735):260-5. PubMed ID: 2649192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of the side effects of urographic contrast media (iothalamate, diatrizoate, iodamide, iopamidol) within the scope of a CT study].
    Stellamor K; Hruby W; Assinger S; Luckner H
    Radiologe; 1984 Oct; 24(10):488-90. PubMed ID: 6505221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MEGLUMINE IOTHALAMATE 60 PER CENT AND SODIUM DIATRIZOATE 50 PER CENT. COMPARISON OF UROGRAPHIC QUALITY AND SIDE-EFFECTS.
    DOTTER CT; JUDKINS MP
    Radiology; 1964 Feb; 82():225. PubMed ID: 14115299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.