These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7308520)

  • 1. Changing parameters of donor semen.
    Leto S; Frensilli FJ
    Fertil Steril; 1981 Dec; 36(6):766-70. PubMed ID: 7308520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of ovulatory dysfunction and timing of insemination on the success of artificial insemination donor (AID) with fresh or cryopreserved semen.
    Smith KD; Rodriguez-Rigau LJ; Steinberger E
    Fertil Steril; 1981 Oct; 36(4):496-502. PubMed ID: 7286272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Artificial insemination in Denmark by frozen donor semen supplied from a central bank.
    Hansen KB; Nielsen NC; Rebbe H
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1979 May; 86(5):384-6. PubMed ID: 465386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Male fertility potential in terms of semen quality: a review of the past, a study of the present.
    MacLeod J; Wang Y
    Fertil Steril; 1979 Feb; 31(2):103-16. PubMed ID: 367823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Therapeutic inseminations of cryopreserved donor sperm in 1,483 menstrual cycles (computer-assisted documentation). II. Effect of the donor on the outcome of insemination].
    Glander HJ; Kunert M; Forberg J
    Dermatol Monatsschr; 1987; 173(11):656-62. PubMed ID: 3436475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conception rate according to semen characteristics in a series of 15 364 insemination cycles: results of a multivariate analysis.
    Mayaux MJ; Schwartz D; Czyglik F; David G
    Andrologia; 1985; 17(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 3994005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of semen quality and follicular growth between conception and non-conception cycles after artificial insemination by donor using cryopreserved semen.
    Glander HJ; Baier D; Haake KW
    Int J Fertil; 1988; 33(3):178-80. PubMed ID: 2899563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decline in semen quality among fertile men in Paris during the past 20 years.
    Auger J; Kunstmann JM; Czyglik F; Jouannet P
    N Engl J Med; 1995 Feb; 332(5):281-5. PubMed ID: 7816062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Homologous artificial insemination after long-term semen cryopreservation.
    Friedman S; Broder S
    Fertil Steril; 1981 Mar; 35(3):321-4. PubMed ID: 7202757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Obtained pregnancies by AID using frozen semen in relation to specific qualities of the semen.
    Nielsen NC; Risum J; Bogaard Hansen K; Nissen U
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1984; 18(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 6489847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved separation of motile sperm in asthenospermia and its application to artificial insemination homologous (AIH).
    Harris SJ; Milligan MP; Masson GM; Dennis KJ
    Fertil Steril; 1981 Aug; 36(2):219-21. PubMed ID: 7262337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A longitudinal analysis of artificial insemination with donor semen.
    Sulewski JM; Eisenberg F; Stenger VG
    Fertil Steril; 1978 May; 29(5):527-31. PubMed ID: 668934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Artificial insemination using homologous semen: a review of 158 cases.
    Dixon RE; Buttram VC; Schum CW
    Fertil Steril; 1976 Jun; 27(6):647-54. PubMed ID: 1278460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of stress on semen quality in semen donors.
    Poland ML; Giblin PT; Ager JW; Moghissi KS
    Int J Fertil; 1986; 31(3):229-31. PubMed ID: 2875966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Semen abnormalities in artificial insemination donor candidates.
    Gerber WL; Bresaw LS
    J Urol; 1983 Aug; 130(2):266-8. PubMed ID: 6876272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective, randomized, blinded evaluation of donor semen quality provided by seven commercial sperm banks.
    Carrell DT; Cartmill D; Jones KP; Hatasaka HH; Peterson CM
    Fertil Steril; 2002 Jul; 78(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 12095484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intrauterine insemination of isolated motile sperm.
    Glass RH; Ericsson RJ
    Fertil Steril; 1978 May; 29(5):535-8. PubMed ID: 668936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of semen and donor factors on the success rate of artificial insemination with frozen semen.
    Mahadevan MM; Trounson AO; Milne BJ; Leeton JF
    Clin Reprod Fertil; 1982 Sep; 1(3):185-93. PubMed ID: 6897907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transmission of human T-cell lymphotropic virus type III (HTLV-III) by artificial insemination by donor.
    Stewart GJ; Tyler JP; Cunningham AL; Barr JA; Driscoll GL; Gold J; Lamont BJ
    Lancet; 1985 Sep; 2(8455):581-5. PubMed ID: 2863597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semen analysis: criteria for cryopreservation of human spermatozoa.
    Glassman AB; Bennett CE
    Fertil Steril; 1980 Jul; 34(1):66-7. PubMed ID: 7398911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.