These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7309767)

  • 1. A study of bone remodeling using metal-polymer laminates.
    Szivek JA; Weatherly GC; Pilliar RM; Cameron HU
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1981 Nov; 15(6):853-65. PubMed ID: 7309767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bone ingrowth and stress shielding with a porous surface coated fracture fixation plate.
    Pilliar RM; Cameron HU; Binnington AG; Szivek J; Macnab I
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1979 Sep; 13(5):799-810. PubMed ID: 383716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in long-bone structural properties during the first 8 weeks of plate implantation.
    Carter DR; Shimaoka EE; Harris WH; Gates EI; Caler WE; McCarthy JC
    J Orthop Res; 1984; 2(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 6491803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Strain distribution in the proximal femur with flexible composite and metallic femoral components under axial and torsional loads.
    Otani T; Whiteside LA; White SE
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 May; 27(5):575-85. PubMed ID: 8314810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bone remodelling after internal fixation with different stiffness plates: ultrastructural investigation.
    Chen YQ; Dai KR; Qiu SJ; Zhu ZA
    Chin Med J (Engl); 1994 Oct; 107(10):766-70. PubMed ID: 7835104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The mechanical and morphological properties of bone beneath internal fixation plates of differing rigidity.
    Claes L
    J Orthop Res; 1989; 7(2):170-7. PubMed ID: 2918416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of stainless steel and composite plates in the healing of diaphyseal osteotomies of the dog radius: report on a short term study.
    Coutts RE; Akeson WH; Woo S; Matthews JV; Gonsalves M; Amiel D
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1976 Jan; 7(1):223-9. PubMed ID: 1256790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [An experimental study of the effects of stress-relaxation plate on bone remodeling].
    Dai M; Dai K; Qui S
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1995 Nov; 33(11):698-700. PubMed ID: 8731919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parametric study of bone remodeling beneath internal fixation plates of varying stiffness.
    Simon BR; Woo SL; McCarty M; Lee S; Akeson WH
    J Bioeng; 1978; 2(6):543-56. PubMed ID: 753844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of fixation devices on radiostrontium clearance in the intact canine femur.
    Daum WJ; Simmons DJ; Chang SL; Lehman RC; Webster D
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1985 Apr; (194):306-12. PubMed ID: 3978932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of implant material and plate design on tendon function and morphology.
    Cohen MS; Turner TM; Urban RM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Apr; 445():81-90. PubMed ID: 16601410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Experimental studies of the effects of prestress on intact canine bone structure].
    Liu B; Lu S; Wang J
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1995 Jun; 33(6):374-7. PubMed ID: 8582227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Release of metal in vivo from stressed and nonstressed maxillofacial fracture plates and screws.
    Matthew IR; Frame JW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Jul; 90(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 10884633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects on intact femora of dogs of the application and removal of metal plates. A metabolic and structural study comparing stiffer and more flexible plates.
    Moyen BJ; Lahey PJ; Weinberg EH; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1978 Oct; 60(7):940-7. PubMed ID: 100500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A computational evaluation of the effect of intramedullary nail material properties on the stabilization of simulated femoral shaft fractures.
    Perez A; Mahar A; Negus C; Newton P; Impelluso T
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 Jul; 30(6):755-60. PubMed ID: 17905637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical evaluation of six types of reconstruction following 25, 50, and 75% resection of the proximal femur.
    Kohles SS; Markel MD; Rock MG; Chao EY; Vanderby R
    J Orthop Res; 1994 Nov; 12(6):834-43. PubMed ID: 7983559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A comparative study of effects on bone healing and remodelling between embracing fixator and bone].
    Wu X; Dai K; Qiu S
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1995 Aug; 33(8):481-4. PubMed ID: 8706565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tendon reattachment to a metallic implant using an allogenic bone plate augmented with rhOP-1 vs. autogenous cancellous bone and marrow in a canine model.
    Higuera CA; Inoue N; Lim JS; Zhang R; Dimaano N; Frassica FJ; Chao EY
    J Orthop Res; 2005 Sep; 23(5):1091-9. PubMed ID: 16140192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distal femoral fixation: a biomechanical comparison of trigen retrograde intramedullary (i.m.) nail, dynamic condylar screw (DCS), and locking compression plate (LCP) condylar plate.
    Heiney JP; Barnett MD; Vrabec GA; Schoenfeld AJ; Baji A; Njus GO
    J Trauma; 2009 Feb; 66(2):443-9. PubMed ID: 19204519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of porous surface configuration on the tensile strength of fixation of implants by bone ingrowth.
    Bobyn JD; Pilliar RM; Cameron HU; Weatherly GC; Kent GM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1980 Jun; (149):291-8. PubMed ID: 7408314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.