BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7316882)

  • 1. Early auditory-evoked responses: spectral content.
    Laukli E; Mair IW
    Audiology; 1981; 20(6):453-64. PubMed ID: 7316882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency specificity of the auditory brainstem responses in the cat.
    Mair IW; Laukli E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1985; 99(3-4):377-83. PubMed ID: 4013727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bilateral recording of early auditory evoked responses in the cat.
    Mair IW; Elverland HH; Laukli E
    Hear Res; 1978 Oct; 1(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 757228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of the stimulus repetition rate on brain-stem-evoked responses in man.
    van Olphen AF; Rodenburg M; Verwey C
    Audiology; 1979; 18(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 496721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of surface-recorded cochlear and early neural potentials in the cat.
    Laukli E; Mair IW
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1981; 233(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 7316868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory electrophysiology: spectral analysis of cochlear and brain stem evoked potentials. A comment on: Kevanishvili and Aphonchenko: "Frequency composition of brain stem auditory evoked potentials".
    Elberling C
    Scand Audiol; 1979; 8(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 515685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new parameter in brain stem evoked response: component wave areas.
    Anthony PF; Durrett R; Pulec JL; Hartstone JL
    Laryngoscope; 1979 Oct; 89(10 Pt 1):1569-78. PubMed ID: 388123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The indication for brain stem evoked response and the effect of click rate and stimulus intensity on the latencies of the auditory evoked potentials (author's transl)].
    Baschek V; Steinert W
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1980 Oct; 59(10):690-7. PubMed ID: 7453423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Brainstem responses to tone pip and click stimuli.
    Bauch CD; Rose DE; Harner SG
    Ear Hear; 1980; 1(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 7409354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The accuracy of objective threshold determination at low frequencies: comparison of different auditory brainstem response (ABR) and auditory steady state response (ASSR) methods.
    Frank J; Baljić I; Hoth S; Eßer D; Guntinas-Lichius O
    Int J Audiol; 2017 May; 56(5):337-345. PubMed ID: 28599607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Origins of the scalp recorded frequency-following response in the cat.
    Gardi J; Merzenich M; McKean C
    Audiology; 1979; 18(5):358-81. PubMed ID: 496719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses to clicks masked by notched noise.
    van Zanten GA; Brocaar MP
    Audiology; 1984; 23(3):253-64. PubMed ID: 6732630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Correlation of the latency shift and brain stem potentials in basocochlear hearing loss and the time course of the click stimulus-induced evoked wave in the cochlea].
    Janssen T; Steinhoff HJ; Böhnke F
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1989 Jul; 68(7):379-82. PubMed ID: 2765050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Threshold prediction from the auditory 40-Hz evoked potential.
    Lynn JM; Lesner SA; Sandridge SA; Daddario CC
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(6):366-70. PubMed ID: 6510584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of rise time on simultaneously recorded auditory-evoked potentials from the early, middle and late ranges.
    Kodera K; Hink RF; Yamada O; Suzuki JI
    Audiology; 1979; 18(5):395-402. PubMed ID: 496722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Brain stem potentials and the auditory threshold].
    Novák M; Janisch R
    Cesk Otolaryngol; 1982 Jan; 31(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 7067008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The frequency specificity of tone-pip evoked auditory brain stem responses.
    Kileny P
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(6):270-5. PubMed ID: 7308602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of ototoxicity on the auditory brain stem response and the scalp-recorded cochlear microphonic in guinea pigs.
    Schwent VL; Williston JS; Jewett DL
    Laryngoscope; 1980 Aug; 90(8 Pt 1):1350-9. PubMed ID: 7401837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequency-following responses in the cat.
    Mair IW; Laukli E
    Hear Res; 1984 Jul; 15(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 6480518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Electrocochleography and auditory brain stem responses in pediatric audiology. Comparison of results in threshold determination].
    Conti G; Arslan E; Camurri L; Prosser S
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1984; 4(6):655-66. PubMed ID: 6534051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.