These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7316886)

  • 1. Do the blind hear better? Investigations on auditory processing in congenital or early acquired blindness. I. Peripheral functions.
    Starlinger I; Niemeyer W
    Audiology; 1981; 20(6):503-9. PubMed ID: 7316886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do the blind hear better? Investigations on auditory processing in congenital or early acquired blindness. II. Central functions.
    Niemeyer W; Starlinger I
    Audiology; 1981; 20(6):510-5. PubMed ID: 7316887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory gap detection in the early blind.
    Weaver KE; Stevens AA
    Hear Res; 2006 Jan; 211(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 16256283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Crossed and uncrossed acoustic reflex growth functions in normal-hearing adults, typically developing children, and children with suspected auditory processing disorder.
    Saxena U; Allan C; Allen P
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(9):620-6. PubMed ID: 26107426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Early but not late-blindness leads to enhanced auditory perception.
    Wan CY; Wood AG; Reutens DC; Wilson SJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(1):344-8. PubMed ID: 19703481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Recruitment detection--a comparison of category loudness scaling and classical supra-threshold audiometry].
    Kiessling J; Pfreimer C; Schubert M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Jan; 75(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 8851113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of congenital blindness on the subcortical representation of speech cues.
    Jafari Z; Malayeri S
    Neuroscience; 2014 Jan; 258():401-9. PubMed ID: 24291729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory processing performance in blind people.
    Boas LV; Muniz L; da Silva Caldas Neto S; Gouveia MCL
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2011; 77(4):504-509. PubMed ID: 21860978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Functional characteristics of auditory cortex in the blind.
    Stevens AA; Weaver KE
    Behav Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 196(1):134-8. PubMed ID: 18805443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Click- and tone-burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing ears and in ears with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Hauser R; Probst R; Löhle E
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1991; 248(6):345-52. PubMed ID: 1930984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The superiority in voice processing of the blind arises from neural plasticity at sensory processing stages.
    Föcker J; Best A; Hölig C; Röder B
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(8):2056-67. PubMed ID: 22588063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of gender on a frequency discrimination task in children.
    Zaltz Y; Roth DA; Gover H; Liran S; Kishon-Rabin L
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2014 Sep; 25(3):293-9. PubMed ID: 25153232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Motion processing after sight restoration: No competition between visual recovery and auditory compensation.
    Bottari D; Kekunnaya R; Hense M; Troje NF; Sourav S; Röder B
    Neuroimage; 2018 Feb; 167():284-296. PubMed ID: 29175496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory threshold evaluation by distortion-product oto-acoustic emissions using decision support system.
    Bonfils P; Avan P; Elbez M; Deys S; Erminy M; François M
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1994 Jul; 114(4):360-5. PubMed ID: 7976306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acoustic reflex thresholds in young and elderly subjects with normal hearing.
    Gelfand SA; Piper N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Jan; 69(1):295-7. PubMed ID: 7217527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Central auditory skills in blind and sighted subjects.
    Muchnik C; Efrati M; Nemeth E; Malin M; Hildesheimer M
    Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 1842264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory processing, acoustic reflex and phonological expression.
    Attoni TM; Quintas VG; Mota HB
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 76(6):753-61. PubMed ID: 21180944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of audiometric configuration on threshold and suprathreshold auditory steady-state responses.
    Vander Werff KR; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):310-26. PubMed ID: 15937412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Further evidence that congenitally blind participants react faster to auditory and tactile spatial targets.
    Collignon O; De Volder AG
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Dec; 63(4):287-93. PubMed ID: 20025387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustic echoplanar scanner noise and pure tone hearing thresholds: the effects of sequence repetition times and acoustic noise rates.
    Ulmer JL; Biswal BB; Mark LP; Mathews VP; Prost RW; Millen SJ; Garman JN; Horzewski D
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(3):480-6. PubMed ID: 9606392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.