These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 731717)

  • 1. The Bakke case.
    Bookert CC
    J Natl Med Assoc; 1978 Dec; 70(12):903. PubMed ID: 731717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bakke: not a black and white decision.
    Looney WF
    Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1978 Aug; 6(8):37-40. PubMed ID: 703479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The University of California v. Bakke: a murky future.
    Bork RH
    Regulation; 1978; 2(5):36-9. PubMed ID: 10238569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The University of California v. Bakke: conversation with a dean of admissions.
    Marshall B
    Regulation; 1978; 2(5):39. PubMed ID: 10238570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The University of California v. Bakke: the court's three decisions.
    Sindler AP
    Regulation; 1978; 2(5):15-23. PubMed ID: 10238565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. After Bakke.
    Huth EJ
    Ann Intern Med; 1978 Oct; 89(4):567-8. PubMed ID: 697238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Backing into Bakke.
    Health PAC Bull; 1977 Jun; (76):4-5. PubMed ID: 10236351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Bakke case and 'reverse discrimination'.
    Evans TE
    Hosp Pract; 1977 Dec; 12(12):13,16. PubMed ID: 924423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. After Bakke many questions are left unanswered.
    Graumann FW; Lippman ME
    Hospitals; 1978 Nov; 52(22):73-5. PubMed ID: 700653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bakke vs. Univ. of California: pure and simple..
    Johnson ET
    Urban Health; 1977 Apr; 6(3):6. PubMed ID: 10235887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke: must medical school admissions programs be "color-blind"?
    Berg RN
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1977 Nov; 66(11):907-8. PubMed ID: 925541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The case for minority admissions.
    N Engl J Med; 1977 Dec; 297(26):1472-3. PubMed ID: 927474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medical school admission: then and now.
    Prieto DO; Cureton MT; Swanson AG
    J Natl Med Assoc; 1988 Jan; 80(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 3339641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. After Bakke, what?
    Alexis CP
    JAMA; 1978 Sep; 240(9):831-2. PubMed ID: 671726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The case for minority admissions.
    Schatzkin A; Yergan J
    N Engl J Med; 1977 Sep; 297(10):554-6. PubMed ID: 887108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medical school sweepstakes.
    Caress B
    Health PAC Bull; 1977 Jun; (76):2-7. PubMed ID: 10236350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minority admissions: quo vadis?
    Prieto DO; Mendoza FS
    J Med Educ; 1987 Aug; 62(8):698-700. PubMed ID: 3612737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implications of the Bakke decision for veterinary college admissions.
    Andberg WL
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1979 Jan; 174(1):97-100. PubMed ID: 378920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Should Bakke win?
    Mode AS
    Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1978 May; 6(5):6. PubMed ID: 703474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bakke decision revisited.
    N Engl J Med; 1982 Feb; 306(5):306-7. PubMed ID: 7054708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.