These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7317656)
1. An invitation to the dance: an empirical response to Chief Justice Warren Burger's "time-consuming procedural minuets" theory in Parham v. J.R. Perlin ML Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1981; 9(2):149-64. PubMed ID: 7317656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Parham v. J. R.: "voluntary" commitment of minors to mental institutions. Tiano LV Am J Law Med; 1980; 6(1):125-49. PubMed ID: 7435506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Due process in the "voluntary" civil commitment of juvenile wards. Glaessner PO J Leg Med; 1981 Jun; 2(2):169-92. PubMed ID: 6972431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Formal commitment hearings not necessary for children, Supreme Court rulings say. Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1979 Sep; 30(9):645, 649. PubMed ID: 468145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Children's rights after the supreme court's decision on Parham v. J.L. and J.R. Frank CC Child Welfare; 1980 Jun; 59(6):375-80. PubMed ID: 7379613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Post-Parham remedies: the involuntary commitment of minors in Virginia after Parham v. J.R. Spaulding WJ Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1979; 13(4):695-741. PubMed ID: 11665159 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Warren Burger and the civil commitment tetralogy. Shuman D Int J Law Psychiatry; 1980; 3(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 7002809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A footnote to Parham: Was J. L. a casualty of the mental health bar? Lacoursiere RB Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1983; 11(3):279-85. PubMed ID: 6640121 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Power, uncertainty, and choice: the voluntary commitment of children--Parham v. J.L. Simet DP Univ West Ont Law Rev; 1982 May; 20(1):141-61. PubMed ID: 11658705 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Institutionalization of juveniles: what process is due? Parham v. J.R. Herbsleb J Neb Law Rev; 1980; 59(1):190-213. PubMed ID: 11658460 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Constitutional law--due process--civil commitment of children by parents--Parham v. J.R. Citarella KC NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1980; 25(4):1001-25. PubMed ID: 11658638 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Can parents "volunteer" their children into mental institutions: an analysis of Kremens v. Bartley and Parham v. J.L. and J.R. Ment Retard Law; 1978 Jan; ():1-8. PubMed ID: 11686183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Supreme Court decisions on mental health: a review. Weiner BA Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1982 Jun; 33(6):461-4. PubMed ID: 7095767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A chance to be heard: an application of Bellotti v. Baird to the civil commitment of minors. Butler KA Hastings Law J; 1981 May; 32(5):1285-318. PubMed ID: 11658348 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Postadmission due process for mentally ill and mentally retarded children after Parham v. J.R. and Secretary of Public Welfare v. Institutionalized Juveniles. Joseph BC Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1979; 29(1):129-57. PubMed ID: 11665106 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Protecting children against unnecessary institutionalization. Tsesis AV South Tex Law Rev; 1998; 39(4):995-1027. PubMed ID: 12778917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. parham v. J.R. and Secretary of Public Welfare v. Institutionalized Juveniles: civil commitments and the balance of authority between child, parent, and state. Martin CA Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1980 Jan; 7(1):158-69. PubMed ID: 11660936 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A note on the meaning of the Donaldson decision. Reinert RE Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1979 Aug; 30(8):563-4. PubMed ID: 457050 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Supreme Court looks at psychiatry. Appelbaum PS Am J Psychiatry; 1984 Jul; 141(7):827-35. PubMed ID: 6731630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]