These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 731808)

  • 1. Vesical neck closure versus balloon catheter in suprapubic prostatectomy: a controlled clinical trial.
    Hahne B; van der Linden W
    J Urol; 1978 Dec; 120(6):699-701. PubMed ID: 731808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Urethral catheter traction reduces bleeding compared with suturing of prostatic vesical junction during suprapubic prostatectomy: a randomized clinical trial study.
    Shirazi M; Ghaffari S; Hassanpour A; Salehipoor M; Afrasiabi MA
    Urology; 2009 Jul; 74(1):137-41. PubMed ID: 19428082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Early removal of urethral catheter with suprapubic tube drainage versus urethral catheter drainage alone after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Prasad SM; Large MC; Patel AR; Famakinwa O; Galocy RM; Karrison T; Shalhav AL; Zagaja GP
    J Urol; 2014 Jul; 192(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 24440236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Postoperative patient comfort in suprapubic drainage versus transurethral catheterization following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial.
    Harke N; Godes M; Habibzada J; Urbanova K; Wagner C; Zecha H; Addali M; Witt JH
    World J Urol; 2017 Mar; 35(3):389-394. PubMed ID: 27334135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of suprapubic prostatectomy with and without vesical neck closure.
    Krahn H; Morales P; Hotchkiss R
    J Urol; 1966 Jul; 96(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 5916502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retropubic, hypotensive, no-catheter prostatectomy: a review of 100 cases.
    Evans JP; Smart JG; Bagshaw PF
    Br J Urol; 1982 Aug; 54(4):387-92. PubMed ID: 7116106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Suprapubic prostatectomy. Modified Hryntschak technique.
    Witherington R; Shelor WC
    Urology; 1974 Nov; 4(5):550-6. PubMed ID: 4139795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The combined prostatectomy.
    Firfer R; Berkson BM; Lipshitz S; Hsieh WH
    J Urol; 1984 Oct; 132(4):687-9. PubMed ID: 6381764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new suture technique for anastomosis in radical retropubic prostatectomy and early removal of urethral catheter.
    Türkeri LN; Temiz Y; Yazici CM; Tinay I
    Can J Urol; 2007 Dec; 14(6):3734-8. PubMed ID: 18163924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of suprapubic catheterization versus transurethral catheterization after abdominal surgery on urinary tract infection: a randomized controlled trial.
    Baan AH; Vermeulen H; van der Meulen J; Bossuyt P; Olszyna D; Gouma DJ
    Dig Surg; 2003; 20(4):290-5. PubMed ID: 12789024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Hryntschak prostatectomy. 3. A modified technique of closing the vesical neck and prostatic cavity.
    Beck AD; Gaudin HJ
    J Urol; 1970 Nov; 104(5):739-44. PubMed ID: 4098837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Catheter-less robotic radical prostatectomy using a custom-made synchronous anastomotic splint and vesical urinary diversion device: report of the initial series and perioperative outcomes.
    Tewari A; Rao S; Mandhani A
    BJU Int; 2008 Sep; 102(8):1000-4. PubMed ID: 18710459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A modified technique of simple suprapubic prostatectomy: no bladder drainage and no bladder neck or hemostatic sutures.
    Moslemi MK; Abedin Zadeh M
    Urol J; 2010; 7(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 20209457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transurethral versus suprapubic catheter at robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized trial with 1-year follow-up.
    Martinschek A; Pfalzgraf D; Rafail B; Ritter M; Heinrich E; Trojan L
    World J Urol; 2016 Mar; 34(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 26337521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modification of Technique for Suprapubic Catheter Placement After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Reduces Catheter-associated Complications.
    Afzal MZ; Tobert CM; Bulica E; Noyes SL; Lane BR
    Urology; 2015 Aug; 86(2):401-6. PubMed ID: 26189333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safety and outcome of early catheter removal after radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Tiguert R; Rigaud J; Fradet Y
    Urology; 2004 Mar; 63(3):513-7. PubMed ID: 15028448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perivesical fat closure during suprapubic prostatectomy: does it prevent urinary leakage? A prospective randomized study.
    Stein A; Ratzkovitzki R; Lurie A
    Tech Urol; 1996; 2(2):99-101. PubMed ID: 9118417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Pilcher bag technique with standard suprapubic prostatectomy.
    Rathod DM; Pareek NK; Coleman JW; McGovern JH
    Urology; 1980 Apr; 15(4):342-4. PubMed ID: 7394958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suprapubic prostatectomy with a novel catheter.
    Djaladat H; Mehrsai A; Saraji A; Moosavi S; Djaladat Y; Pourmand G
    J Urol; 2006 Jun; 175(6):2083-6. PubMed ID: 16697808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. No-catheter suprapubic vacuum drainage of the bladder and prostatic cavity after transvesical prostatectomy.
    Salmela H
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1980; 69(3):106-11. PubMed ID: 6158284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.