These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7320380)

  • 1. Low cost random access acuity projector.
    Cook BJ
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1981 Nov; 52(11):871-4. PubMed ID: 7320380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Refractive error and preferential looking visual acuity in human infants: a pilot study.
    Kohl P; Rolen RD; Bedford AK; Samek M; Stern N
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1986 Apr; 57(4):290-6. PubMed ID: 3700952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic measurement of the refractive properties of the eye.
    Safir A
    Med Res Eng; 1972; 11(2):12-20. PubMed ID: 4665901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is the Cardiff Acuity Test effective in detecting refractive errors in children?
    Howard C; Firth AY
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):577-81. PubMed ID: 16909076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new method of subjective refraction.
    Humphrey WE
    Buch Augenarzt; 1982; 90():13-21. PubMed ID: 7093775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [On mass examination with a mobile vision-screening unit].
    Kozaki M; Nakayama S; Mizuno N
    Nihon Ganka Kiyo; 1969 Feb; 20(2):129-39. PubMed ID: 5815602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new subjective refraction method--the meridional polarized vernier optometer.
    Salmon TO; Horner DG
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Oct; 67(10):599-605. PubMed ID: 8942132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Influence of hypobaric environmental and working conditions on the ocular dioptric apparatus].
    Popescu MP; Stefan M; Cincă N; Pintilie I; Stoian M
    Fiziol Norm Patol; 1965; 11(5):465-71. PubMed ID: 5865217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing visual function in the clinical setting.
    Westheimer G
    Clin Exp Optom; 2010 Jul; 93(4):209-12. PubMed ID: 20465546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy, repeatability, and clinical application of spherocylindrical automated refraction using time-based wavefront aberrometry measurements.
    Nissman SA; Tractenberg RE; Saba CM; Douglas JC; Lustbader JM
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Apr; 113(4):577.e1-2. PubMed ID: 16527354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Low contrast charts effectively differentiate between types of blur.
    Ho A; Bilton SM
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1986 Mar; 63(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 3963143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Subjective refractometry].
    Risse JF; Flament J
    Annee Ther Clin Ophtalmol; 1986; 37():19-40. PubMed ID: 3674817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Should not we correct some of Donder's assumptions?].
    Rozenblium IuZ
    Vestn Oftalmol; 1999; 115(1):37-8. PubMed ID: 10207323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Study of visual acuity and clinical refraction at short distance].
    Pasechnikova NV
    Oftalmol Zh; 1986; (4):235-8. PubMed ID: 3763113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic measurement errors involved in over-refraction using an autorefractor (Grand-Seiko WV-500): is measurement of accommodative lag through spectacle lenses valid?
    Kimura S; Hasebe S; Ohtsuki H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 17470241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vision screening.
    Freedman H
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1248-9; discussion 1249. PubMed ID: 16815414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Principles of modern determination of refraction].
    Krause K
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1989 May; 194(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 2664321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Random measurement error in visual acuity measurement in clinical settings.
    Leinonen J; Laakkonen E; Laatikainen L
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2005 Jun; 83(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 15948786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of refraction--a literature review.
    Goss DA; Grosvenor T
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Oct; 67(10):619-30. PubMed ID: 8942135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The principle of stimulus threshold of esthesiophysiology in the vision test used on crosscylinder and the blur balance].
    Illig KM
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1972 Jun; 160(6):716-8. PubMed ID: 4662727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.