BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7320774)

  • 1. Otologic referral in industrial hearing conservation programs.
    Dobie RA; Archer RJ
    J Occup Med; 1981 Nov; 23(11):755-61. PubMed ID: 7320774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Results of otologic referrals in an industrial hearing conservation program.
    Dobie RA; Archer RJ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1981; 89(2):294-301. PubMed ID: 6787529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Industrial audiometry and the otologist.
    Dobie RA
    Laryngoscope; 1985 Apr; 95(4):382-5. PubMed ID: 3982182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The otologic referral criteria for occupational hearing conservation programs. Medical Aspects of noise Committee. American Council of Otolaryngology.
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1979 Aug; 12(3):635-6. PubMed ID: 471508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability and validity of industrial audiometry: implications for hearing conservation program design.
    Dobie RA
    Laryngoscope; 1983 Jul; 93(7):906-27. PubMed ID: 6865627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding and preventing noise-induced hearing loss.
    Hong O; Kerr MJ; Poling GL; Dhar S
    Dis Mon; 2013 Apr; 59(4):110-8. PubMed ID: 23507351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Otologic referral criteria.
    Dobie RA
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1982; 90(5):598-601. PubMed ID: 6819519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Standard threshold shift criteria. An investigation of the most reliable indicator of noise-induced hearing loss.
    Lane CL; Dobie RA; Crawford DR; Morgan MS
    J Occup Med; 1985 Jan; 27(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 3968596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Criteria for the assessment of the noise-induced occupational hearing loss: international and national standards].
    Izmerov NF; Denisov ÉI; Adeninskaia EE; Gorblianskiĭ IuIu
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2014; (3):66-71. PubMed ID: 25246217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Industrial hearing conservation.
    Glorig A
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1979 Aug; 12(3):609-21. PubMed ID: 471506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictive factors of occupational noise-induced hearing loss in Spanish workers: A prospective study.
    Pelegrin AC; Canuet L; Rodríguez ÁA; Morales MP
    Noise Health; 2015; 17(78):343-9. PubMed ID: 26356377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distribution of risk factors for hearing loss: implications for evaluating risk of occupational noise-induced hearing loss.
    Prince MM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Aug; 112(2):557-67. PubMed ID: 12186037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Specific effects upon hearing due to occupational noise].
    Carp CM; Dinu C
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2006; 110(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 19292087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hearing conservation in industry.
    Dobie RA
    West J Med; 1982 Dec; 137(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 7164430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Value of audiometry.
    Ensell FJ
    J Soc Occup Med; 1973 Oct; 23(4):134. PubMed ID: 4283734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Audiometric evaluation of noise induced hearing loss.
    Ruth RA
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1979 Aug; 12(3):639-54. PubMed ID: 471510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Critical analysis of the effectiveness of secondary prevention of occupational hearing loss.
    Hétu R
    J Occup Med; 1979 Apr; 21(4):251-4. PubMed ID: 438914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noise exposure and hearing loss prevention programmes after 20 years of regulations in the United States.
    Daniell WE; Swan SS; McDaniel MM; Camp JE; Cohen MA; Stebbins JG
    Occup Environ Med; 2006 May; 63(5):343-51. PubMed ID: 16551755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Possibility of the diagnosis of occupational hearing loss during preventive mass screening].
    Pankova VB; Dmitrieva KA; Podol'skaia EV
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1988; (5):52-5. PubMed ID: 3067438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation of and trends in hearing surveillance programs in industry].
    Malchaire J
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1988; 42(4):529-37. PubMed ID: 3218500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.