These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7321695)

  • 41. [115 strains of anaerobic gram (+) cocci. II. Study of the sensitivity of anaerobic (+) cocci to 8 antibiotics].
    López Bartolome O; Berzosa A; Betriú C; Cour I
    Rev Clin Esp; 1980 Jul; 157(5):337-41. PubMed ID: 7403609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and patterns of resistance at a tertiary care center.
    Akhter J; Qutub MO; Qadri SM
    Saudi Med J; 2001 Jul; 22(7):569-76. PubMed ID: 11479635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Epidemiological interpretation of antibiotic resistance studies - what are we missing?
    Schwaber MJ; De-Medina T; Carmeli Y
    Nat Rev Microbiol; 2004 Dec; 2(12):979-83. PubMed ID: 15550943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Synthesis and antibacterial activity of novel bifunctional macrolides.
    Akritopoulou-Zanze I; Phelan KM; Marron TG; Yong H; Ma Z; Stone GG; Daly MM; Hensey DM; Nilius AM; Djuric SW
    Bioorg Med Chem Lett; 2004 Jul; 14(14):3809-13. PubMed ID: 15203167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Interactions among antibiotics, bacteria and the human immune system: the clinical relevance of in vitro testing.
    Bergogne-Berezin E
    J Chemother; 1997 May; 9 Suppl 1():109-15. PubMed ID: 9248969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Cross-resistance between antimicrobial agents used in veterinary medicine: molecular background and practical consequences for susceptibility testing].
    Werckenthin C; Böttner A; Hafez HM; Hartmann K; Kaske M; Kehrenberg C; Kietzmann M; Klarmann D; Klein G; Krabisch P; Kühn T; Luhofer G; Richter A; Schulz B; Schwarz S; Sigge C; Traeder W; Waldmann KH; Wallmann J;
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2005; 118(11-12):471-80. PubMed ID: 16318271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Comparison of fixation Dio-Sensitest and disk diffusion techniques for the antibiotic sensitivity of some enteric bacteria].
    Birinci A; Coban AY
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2002 Jan; 36(1):115-6. PubMed ID: 12476776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Resistance tests in general practice. Validity can be improved by standardized procedures].
    Bjerrum L; Grinsted P; Petersen PH; Søgaard P
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Mar; 164(10):1352-6. PubMed ID: 11894428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Bacterial adaptation and resistance to antiseptics, disinfectants and preservatives is not a new phenomenon.
    Russell AD
    J Hosp Infect; 2004 Jun; 57(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 15183238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Incidence and antimicrobial resistance of pathogenic bacteria isolated from children with acute otitis media in Athens, Greece, during the periods 2003-2004 and 2005-2007.
    Papavasileiou K; Papavasileiou E; Voyatzi A; Makri A; Chatzipanagiotou S
    Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2009 Feb; 33(2):183-4. PubMed ID: 18848435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Postantibiotic effects of antimicrobial agents].
    Majtánová L; Majtán V
    Ceska Slov Farm; 1998 Nov; 47(6):255-60. PubMed ID: 10535161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Sensitivity to cotrimoxazole of bacteria isolated at the Central University Hospital of Fann, Dakar].
    Sow AI; Faye Niang MA; Dieng M; Toure K; Fall D; Soumare M; Seydi M; Ndour CT; Cisse MF; Samb A
    Dakar Med; 1999; 44(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 10797980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [An estimation of the degree of antibiotic sensitivity of microbial strains isolated in pediatric and neonatal wards].
    Coşniţă M; Moldovan R; Cioflec DR
    Bacteriol Virusol Parazitol Epidemiol; 1997; 42(1-2):15-20. PubMed ID: 9235137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The inoculum effect: fact or artifact?
    Craig WA; Bhavnani SM; Ambrose PG
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2004 Dec; 50(4):229-30. PubMed ID: 15582294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Evaluation of a simplified method of preparation of the inoculum for making antibiograms with the ABAC system. Comparison with the standard method in 100 cases].
    Ricci E; De Michele MB; Di Giacomandrea D; Terzini A; Castronuovo A
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1982 Dec; 18(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 7186643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Additions and modifications to the range of antibiotics tested by the CDS method of antibiotic sensitivity testing.
    Bell SM
    Pathology; 1988 Jul; 20(3):303-4. PubMed ID: 3205601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Towards a common susceptibility testing method?
    Gould IM
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2000 Jun; 45(6):757-62. PubMed ID: 10837426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Antibiotic sensitivity testing.
    Br Med J; 1971 May; 2(5759):416. PubMed ID: 5575996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A revised system for antibiotic sensitivity testing. The Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics.
    Scand J Infect Dis; 1981; 13(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 7313568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Development of a standardized antibiofilm test.
    Zelver N; Hamilton M; Goeres D; Heersink J
    Methods Enzymol; 2001; 337():363-76. PubMed ID: 11398442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.