These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7321872)

  • 1. Wyatt v. Stickney and mentally retarded individuals.
    Cavalier AR; McCarver RB
    Ment Retard; 1981 Oct; 19(5):209-15. PubMed ID: 7321872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Judicial implementation and Wyatt v. Stickney.
    Drake J
    Ala Law Rev; 1981; 32(2):299-312. PubMed ID: 11650546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wyatt v. Stickney and the right of civilly committed mental patients to adequate treatment.
    Harv Law Rev; 1973 May; 86(7):1282-306. PubMed ID: 11664219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Act 817 of 1979: Arkansas' new involuntary commitment law.
    Faulkner LR
    J Ark Med Soc; 1980 Apr; 76(11):457-63. PubMed ID: 6445353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Constitution v. the snakepit.
    Goodman W
    N Y Times Mag; 1974 p 21+; 17 Mar 1974():. PubMed ID: 11664311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wyatt v. Stickney: rights of the committed.
    Prigmore CS; Davis PR
    Soc Work; 1973 Jul; 18(4):10-8. PubMed ID: 11662933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wyatt v. Stickney: retrospect and prospect. Conference report.
    Byrne G
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1981 Feb; 32(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 11643660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The right to treatment and the psychiatric establishment.
    Stone AA
    Psychiatr Ann; 1974 Sep; 4(9):21-23+. PubMed ID: 11662954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of the court as mental health laws change.
    Flaschner FN
    Ill Bar J; 1973 Nov; 62(3):128-35. PubMed ID: 11664277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of the opinions in Donaldson v. O'Connor and Wyatt v. Aderholt.
    Friedman P
    Ment Retard Law; 1974 Nov; ():1-6. PubMed ID: 11686181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Common sense in the habilitation of mentally retarded persons: a reply to Menolascino and McGee.
    Ellis NR; Balla D; Estes O; Warren SA; Meyers CE; Hollis J; Isaacson RL; Palk BE; Siegel PS
    Ment Retard; 1981 Oct; 19(5):221-5. PubMed ID: 7321874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Has the Pennsylvania legislature over-reacted in setting standards for involuntary commitment of mentally ill persons.
    Rothman DA; Rothman NL
    Pa Nurse; 1978 Feb; 33(2):2-3. PubMed ID: 247270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Deprivation of liberty and the right to treatment.
    Bailey WS; Pyfer JF
    Clgh Rev; 1974 Jan; 7(9):519-28. PubMed ID: 11664309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advocacy and the mentally ill.
    Willetts R
    Soc Work; 1980 Sep; 25(5):372-7. PubMed ID: 10248421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wyatt v. Stickney: a historical perspective.
    Marchetti AG
    Appl Res Ment Retard; 1983; 4(3):189-206. PubMed ID: 6362564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The law and the mentally incompetent.
    Leahy ML; Barnes M
    Public Welf; 1978; 36(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 10294858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Beyond Rouse and Wyatt: an administrative law model for expanding and implementing the mental patient's right to treatment.
    Hoffman PB; Dunn RC
    Va Law Rev; 1975 Mar; 61(2):297-340. PubMed ID: 11664472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The patient always pays: reflections on the Boston State case and the right to rot.
    Gutheil TG; Appelbaum PS
    Man Med; 1980; 5(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 7412396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treatment rights of mentally ill nursing home residents.
    Barnett CF
    Univ PA Law Rev; 1978 Jan; 126(3):578-629. PubMed ID: 11664875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Landmark?: United States Supreme Court recognized the issue of the constitutional rights of civilly committed mental patients.
    Brown A
    J Am Health Care Assoc; 1976 Jan; 2(1):10. PubMed ID: 10246882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.