These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7322043)

  • 1. Experimental measurements of the scatter reduction obtained in mammography with a scanning multiple slit assembly.
    Yester MV; Barnes GT; King MA
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(2):158-62. PubMed ID: 7322043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of reduced scatter on radiographic information content and patient exposure: a quantitative demonstration.
    Wagner RF; Barnes GT; Askins BS
    Med Phys; 1980; 7(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 7366537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scanning slit mammography.
    Barnes GT; Wu X; Wagner AJ
    Med Prog Technol; 1993; 19(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 8302215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Grid and slot scan scatter reduction in mammography: comparison by using Monte Carlo techniques.
    Boone JM; Seibert JA; Tang CM; Lane SM
    Radiology; 2002 Feb; 222(2):519-27. PubMed ID: 11818623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The design and performance of a scanning multiple slit assembly.
    Barnes GT; Brezovich IA
    Med Phys; 1979; 6(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 470842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved image quality in digital mammography with image processing.
    Baydush AH; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 2000 Jul; 27(7):1503-8. PubMed ID: 10947253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scanning slit chest radiography: a practical and efficient scatter control design.
    Barnes GT; Wu X; Sanders PC
    Radiology; 1994 Feb; 190(2):525-8. PubMed ID: 8284410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterization of scatter in digital mammography from physical measurements.
    Leon SM; Brateman LF; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061901. PubMed ID: 24877812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of scatter and an antiscatter grid on the performance of a slot-scanning digital mammography system.
    Shen SZ; Bloomquist AK; Mawdsley GE; Yaffe MJ; Elbakri I
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1108-15. PubMed ID: 16696488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scanning multiple slit assembly: a practical and efficient device to reduce scatter.
    Barnes GT; Brezovich IA; Witten DM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1977 Sep; 129(3):497-501. PubMed ID: 409206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Dose reduction through gridless technique in digital full-field mammography].
    Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Berzeg S; Bick U; Fischer T; Hamm B
    Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):769-74. PubMed ID: 12811688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Algorithmic scatter correction in dual-energy digital mammography.
    Chen X; Nishikawa RM; Chan ST; Lau BA; Zhang L; Mou X
    Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111919. PubMed ID: 24320452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Film based scatter measurement in mammography.
    McLean D; Ainley L; Blackett K
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2000 Mar; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 10921199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cone-beam breast computed tomography with a displaced flat panel detector array.
    Mettivier G; Russo P; Lanconelli N; Meo SL
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2805-19. PubMed ID: 22559652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [New development in mammographic technique: Grid mammography (author's transl)].
    Friedrich M
    Rofo; 1978 Feb; 128(2):207-22. PubMed ID: 147219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantification of scattered radiation in projection mammography: four practical methods compared.
    Salvagnini E; Bosmans H; Struelens L; Marshall NW
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3167-80. PubMed ID: 22755701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reduction of scatter in diagnostic radiology by means of a scanning multiple slit assembly.
    Barnes GT; Cleare HM; Brezovich IA
    Radiology; 1976 Sep; 120(3):691-4. PubMed ID: 948604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characterization of scatter in digital mammography from use of Monte Carlo simulations and comparison to physical measurements.
    Leon SM; Brateman LF; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111914. PubMed ID: 25370647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Imaging characteristics of x-ray capillary optics in digital mammography.
    Kruger DG; Abreu CC; Hendee EG; Kocharian A; Peppler WW; Mistretta CA; MacDonald CA
    Med Phys; 1996 Feb; 23(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 8668099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scatter reduction in mammography with air gap.
    Krol A; Bassano DA; Chamberlain CC; Prasad SC
    Med Phys; 1996 Jul; 23(7):1263-70. PubMed ID: 8839422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.