These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7322061)

  • 1. Resolution in radiographic magnification.
    Wagner LK; Cohen G; Wong WH; Amtey SR
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(3):382-4. PubMed ID: 7322061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnification survey and spot view mammography with a new microfocus X-ray unit: detail resolution and radiation exposure.
    Funke M; Breiter N; Hermann K; Oestmann J; Grabbe E
    Eur Radiol; 1998; 8(3):386-90. PubMed ID: 9510570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new high-definition microfocal X-ray unit.
    Buckland-Wright JC
    Br J Radiol; 1989 Mar; 62(735):201-8. PubMed ID: 2702377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Focal-spot measurement: comparison of slit, pinhole, and star resolution pattern techniques.
    Everson JD; Gray JE
    Radiology; 1987 Oct; 165(1):261-4. PubMed ID: 3628780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The spatial resolution of the digital storage phosphor system. The monitor and film compared].
    Nessi R; Castellana L; Paruccini N; Blanc M; Uslenghi CM
    Radiol Med; 1995 Sep; 90(3):298-302. PubMed ID: 7501837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Considerations on direct magnification in radiology].
    San Nicolò M; Moroder E
    Radiol Med; 1986; 72(7-8):579-83. PubMed ID: 3737993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Value of direct radiographic enlargement (DIMA) in early detection of rheumatic inflammatory lesions. Comparative evaluation with high resolution conventional imaging technique].
    Link TM; Fiebich M; Gaubitz M; Krause F; Vestring T; Schneider M; Peters PE
    Radiologe; 1994 Jul; 34(7):405-10. PubMed ID: 7938489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of image quality obtained with optical and radiographic magnification techniques in fine-detail skeletal radiography: effect of object thickness.
    Doi K; Genant HK; Rossmann K
    Radiology; 1976 Jan; 118(1):189-95. PubMed ID: 1244657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microfocal spot magnification mammography using xeroradiographic and screen-film recording systems.
    Sickles EA
    Radiology; 1979 Jun; 131(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 441362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Technologic improvements in screen-film mammography.
    Haus AG
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):628-37. PubMed ID: 2406777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Measurement of focal spot in X-ray tube using imaging plate].
    Abe S; Negishi T; Fukaya M; Akiyama T; Noguchi M; Fujisaki T; Monma M; Saitoh H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Aug; 60(8):1132-8. PubMed ID: 15389171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Storage phosphor direct magnification mammography in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography--a phantom study.
    Funke M; Breiter N; Hermann KP; Oestmann JW; Grabbe E
    Br J Radiol; 1998 May; 71(845):528-34. PubMed ID: 9691898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vivo demonstration of small intestinal villi in dogs and monkeys using radiographic magnification.
    Goldberg HI; Gould R; Rosenquist J; Royal S; Owen RL; Silverman S
    Radiology; 1982 Jan; 142(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 7053547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Digital storage phosphor mammography in a magnification technic: experimental studies for spatial resolution and for detection of microcalcifications].
    Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Hundertmark C; Sachs J; Gruhl T; Sperner W; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1997 Aug; 167(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 9333359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resolution properties of a 2048 x 2048 matrix image intensifier-TV based digital radiography system.
    Ogura T; Fujita H
    Med Phys; 1994 Mar; 21(3):463-9. PubMed ID: 8208222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Digital image magnification mammography with the storage-screen technique. Standardized and findings-oriented image processing parameters].
    Hundertmark C; Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Grabbe E
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 May; 7(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 9296608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Critical comment on enlargement techniques in diagnostic radiology (author's transl)].
    Schmidt-Hieber M; Strecker E-P
    Rofo; 1975 Aug; 123(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 129378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative evaluation of several rare-earth film-screen systems.
    Braun M; Wilson BC
    Radiology; 1982 Sep; 144(4):915-9. PubMed ID: 7111746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnification mammography: evaluation of screen-film and xeroradiographic techniques.
    Haus AG; Paulus DD; Dodd GD; Cowart RW; Bencomo J
    Radiology; 1979 Oct; 133(1):223-6. PubMed ID: 472295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of two screen-film combinations in contact and magnification mammography: detectability of microcalcifications.
    Oestmann JW; Kopans DB; Linetsky L; Hall DA; McCarthy KA; White G; Swann C; Kelley JE; Johnson LL
    Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):657-9. PubMed ID: 3406394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.