These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7322061)

  • 21. Pediatric high KV/filtered airway radiographs: comparison of CR and film-screen systems.
    Nickoloff EL; Berdon WE; Lu ZF; Ruzal-Shapiro CB; So JC; Dutta AK
    Pediatr Radiol; 2002 Jul; 32(7):476-84. PubMed ID: 12107580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Image quality parameters of film-screen systems].
    Hoeschen D
    Rontgenblatter; 1987 Jun; 40(6):193-9. PubMed ID: 3616429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Experimental investigations of image quality in X-ray mammography with conventional screen film system (SFS), digital phosphor storage plate in/without magnification technique (CR) and digital CCD-technique (CCD).
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Säbel M; Böhner C; Dobritz M; Wenkel E; Bautz W
    Rontgenpraxis; 2001; 54(4):123-6. PubMed ID: 11883115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessment of radiographic screen-film systems: a comparison between the use of a microdensitometer and a drum film digitiser.
    Verdun FR; Pachoud M; Bergmann D; Buhr E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):208-13. PubMed ID: 15933110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Image magnification in digital fluoroscopy.
    Rosenstein DS
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 1998; 39(4):304-8. PubMed ID: 9710131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of testing of collimator and beam alignment, focal spot size with slit camera, and tube current consistency using computed radiography and conventional screen-film systems.
    Meechai T; Chousangsuntorn K; Owasirikul W; Mongkolsuk M; Iampa W
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):160-169. PubMed ID: 31095873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Direct radiographic magnification: evaluation of three microfocus x-ray tubes.
    De Smet AA; Fritz SL; Templeton AW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Jan; 138(1):139-42. PubMed ID: 6976689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The resolving capacity of systems for the reproduction of x-ray images].
    Blinov NN; Mazurov AI
    Med Tekh; 2000; (5):12-5. PubMed ID: 11076357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Magnification mammography using 0.1 mm microfocus. Comparison of grid and spot-view magnification].
    Teubner J; Lenk JZ; Wentz KU; Georgi M
    Radiologe; 1987 Apr; 27(4):155-64. PubMed ID: 3037589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Physics overview of screen-film radiography.
    Ritenour ER
    Radiographics; 1996 Jul; 16(4):903-16. PubMed ID: 8835979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [X-ray phase imaging using a X-ray tube with a small focal spot -improvement of image quality in mammography-].
    Honda C; Ohara H; Ishisaka A; Shimada F; Endo T
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 12766293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of focal spot size on image resolution and test phantom scores in mammography.
    Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1993 May; 66(785):441-6. PubMed ID: 8319066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An analysis of dose efficiency in image intensified fluoroscopic examinations.
    Bernstein H; Muntz EP
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 7322044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Direct digital magnification mammography with a large-surface detector made of amorphous silicon].
    Hermann KP; Hundertmark C; Funke M; von Brenndorff A; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1999 May; 170(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 10370416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Monte Carlo study of the influence of focal spot size, intensity distribution, breast thickness and magnification on spatial resolution of an a-Se digital mammography system using the generalized MTF.
    Sakellaris T; Koutalonis M; Spyrou G; Pascoal A
    Phys Med; 2014 May; 30(3):286-95. PubMed ID: 24011672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
    Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
    Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Preliminary clinical applications of asymmetric screen-film systems in chest radiography].
    Higashida Y; Katsuda N; Tochihara S; Yoshioka S; Bussaka H; Tomiguchi S; Takada T; Matsumoto M; Takahashi M; Yoshida A
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Feb; 54(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 8121782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Radiographic mottle: a comprehensive theory.
    Barnes GT
    Med Phys; 1982; 9(5):656-67. PubMed ID: 7155067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [The factor of magnification in mammography].
    Maggi S; Giuseppetti GM; Spiga G; Macchini M; Procaccini G; Gregori S; Amici F
    Radiol Med; 1989; 78(1-2):101-6. PubMed ID: 2781053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.