These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7322063)

  • 1. Image processing of conventional tomograms.
    Renner WD; Luke JC
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(3):388-95. PubMed ID: 7322063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Digital TV tomosynthesis--system development, digital image processing and clinical applications].
    Sone S
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Dec; 50(12):1473-84. PubMed ID: 2089361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mathematical model of conventional tomography.
    Orphanoudakis SC; Strohbehn JW
    Med Phys; 1976; 3(4):224-32. PubMed ID: 958168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transverse tomosynthesis on a digital simulator.
    Zwicker RD; Atari NA
    Med Phys; 1997 Jun; 24(6):867-71. PubMed ID: 9198020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of a high-resolution digital tomosynthesis system and its clinical application.
    Sone S; Kasuga T; Sakai F; Aoki J; Izuno I; Tanizaki Y; Shigeta H; Shibata K
    Radiographics; 1991 Sep; 11(5):807-22. PubMed ID: 1947318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Digital multilayer tomography. A description of the method and initial clinical results].
    Düber C; Bittner U; Klose KJ; Haberern G; Thelen M
    Rofo; 1989 Oct; 151(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 2554388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital image processing: effect on detectability of simulated low-contrast radiographic patterns.
    Ishida M; Doi K; Loo LN; Metz CE; Lehr JL
    Radiology; 1984 Feb; 150(2):569-75. PubMed ID: 6691118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Image filtering as an alternative to the application of a different reconstruction kernel in CT imaging: feasibility study in lung cancer screening.
    Ohkubo M; Wada S; Kayugawa A; Matsumoto T; Murao K
    Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):3915-23. PubMed ID: 21858988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Linear unsharp mask filtering of linear cross-sectional tomograms of the posterior mandible.
    Chen SK; Hollender L
    Swed Dent J; 1995; 19(4):139-47. PubMed ID: 8560397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Image enhancement of conventional transverse-axial tomograms.
    Strohbehn JW; Yates CH; Curran BH; Sternick ES
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1979 May; 26(5):253-62. PubMed ID: 447354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer analysis of mammography phantom images (CAMPI): an application to the measurement of microcalcification image quality of directly acquired digital images.
    Chakraborty DP
    Med Phys; 1997 Aug; 24(8):1269-77. PubMed ID: 9284251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Signal-to-noise ratio and spatial resolution in x-ray electronic imagers: is the MTF a relevant parameter?
    Moy JP
    Med Phys; 2000 Jan; 27(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 10659741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comprehensive physical image quality evaluation of a selenium based digital x-ray imaging system for thorax radiography.
    Launders JH; Kengyelics SM; Cowen AR
    Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):986-97. PubMed ID: 9650189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experimental and theoretical x-ray imaging performance comparison of iodine and lanthanide contrast agents.
    Cardinal HN; Holdsworth DW; Drangova M; Hobbs BB; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(1):15-31. PubMed ID: 8455493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Filter material selection for region of interest radiologic imaging.
    Massoumzadeh P; Rudin S; Bednarek DR
    Med Phys; 1998 Feb; 25(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 9507475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of x-ray spectra on the DQE of a computed radiography system.
    Fetterly KA; Hangiandreou NJ
    Med Phys; 2001 Feb; 28(2):241-9. PubMed ID: 11243349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Texture analysis in radiographs: the influence of modulation transfer function and noise on the discriminative ability of texture features.
    Veenland JF; Grashuis JL; Gelsema ES
    Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):922-36. PubMed ID: 9650183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of modulation transfer function shape on computed tomographic image quality.
    Joseph PM; Stockham CD
    Radiology; 1982 Oct; 145(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 7122876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The evolution of digital radiography: from storage phosphors to flat-panel detectors.
    Porcelli A; Maggi F; Spalvieri S; Meduri A; Marano P
    Rays; 2003; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 14509175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.