These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7322077)

  • 21. The low energy X-ray response of the LiF:Mg:Cu:P thermoluminescent dosemeter: a comparison with LiF:Mg:Ti.
    Edwards CR; Mountford PJ; Green S; Palethorpe JE; Moloney AJ
    Br J Radiol; 2005 Jun; 78(930):543-7. PubMed ID: 15900061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In-phantom response of LiF TLD-100 for dosimetry of 192Ir HDR source.
    Pradhan AS; Quast U
    Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):1025-9. PubMed ID: 10841406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The use of active personal dosemeters as a personal monitoring device: comparison with TL dosimetry.
    Boziari A; Koukorava C; Carinou E; Hourdakis CJ; Kamenopoulou V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):173-6. PubMed ID: 21196464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mailed thermoluminescent dosimeter determination of entrance skin exposure and half-value layer in mammography.
    Wochos JF; Fullerton GD; DeWerd LA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Oct; 131(4):617-9. PubMed ID: 102151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Studies on the response of the TLD badge for high-energy photons.
    Kumar M; Kher RK; Sahni G; Chhokra K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 17681962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of two methods of in vivo dosimetry for a high energy neutron beam.
    Blake SW; Bonnett DE; Finch J
    Br J Radiol; 1990 Jun; 63(750):476-81. PubMed ID: 2379072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ion recombination and polarity effect of ionization chambers in kilovoltage x-ray exposure measurements.
    Das IJ; Akber SF
    Med Phys; 1998 Sep; 25(9):1751-7. PubMed ID: 9775383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The influence of neutron contamination on dosimetry in external photon beam radiotherapy.
    Horst F; Czarnecki D; Zink K
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6529-36. PubMed ID: 26520743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Breast dosimetry.
    Dance DR; Skinner CL; Carlsson GA
    Appl Radiat Isot; 1999 Jan; 50(1):185-203. PubMed ID: 10028637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dosimetry in an IMRT phantom designed for a remote monitoring program.
    Han Y; Shin EH; Lim C; Kang SK; Park SH; Lah JE; Suh TS; Yoon M; Lee SB; Cho SH; Ibbott GS; Ju SG; Ahn YC
    Med Phys; 2008 Jun; 35(6):2519-27. PubMed ID: 18649485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. On the wall perturbation correction for a parallel-plate NACP-02 chamber in clinical electron beams.
    Zink K; Wulff J
    Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):1045-54. PubMed ID: 21452742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparative study on the susceptibility of LiF:Mg,Ti (TLD-100) and LiF:Mg,Cu,P (TLD-100H) to spurious signals in thermoluminescence dosimetry.
    Al-Haj A; Lagarde C; Mahyoub F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):399-402. PubMed ID: 17223633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Digital recording of glow curves of the TLD-300 thermoluminescent dosimetry detector by adaptation of a sum of Gauss function to the measured values].
    Meissner P
    Strahlentherapie; 1985 Feb; 161(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 3975938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Optimization of technique factors for a silicon diode array full-field digital mammography system and comparison to screen-film mammography with matched average glandular dose.
    Berns EA; Hendrick RE; Cutter GR
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 12674233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The performance of commercial photodiodes for dosimetry in mammography.
    Batista E; Khoury HJ; Melo FA; Barros V; da Silva EF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):391-3. PubMed ID: 16381752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Characteristics of an OSLD in the diagnostic energy range.
    Al-Senan RM; Hatab MR
    Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4396-405. PubMed ID: 21859040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dosimetric aspects of film/screen mammography: in-phantom dosimetry with thimble-type ionisation chambers.
    Zoetelief J; de Wit NJ; Broerse JJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1989 Sep; 34(9):1169-77. PubMed ID: 2798557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Correction factors for A1SL ionization chamber dosimetry in TomoTherapy: machine-specific, plan-class, and clinical fields.
    Gago-Arias A; Rodriguez-Romero R; Sanchez-Rubio P; Miguel Gonzalez-Castano D; Gomez F; Nunez L; Palmans H; Sharpe P; Pardo-Montero J
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1964-70. PubMed ID: 22482617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An improved volumetric dosimeter for internal dose verification.
    Aissi A; Poston JW
    Health Phys; 1984 Feb; 46(2):371-6. PubMed ID: 6693267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. On the implementation of a recently proposed dosimetric formalism to a robotic radiosurgery system.
    Pantelis E; Moutsatsos A; Zourari K; Kilby W; Antypas C; Papagiannis P; Karaiskos P; Georgiou E; Sakelliou L
    Med Phys; 2010 May; 37(5):2369-79. PubMed ID: 20527571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.