These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7322798)

  • 1. Two strategies in fricative discrimination.
    Repp BH
    Percept Psychophys; 1981 Sep; 30(3):217-27. PubMed ID: 7322798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Characteristics of the auditory spectral diffraction essential for distinguishing soft vowels from fricative consonants in perception].
    Zhukov SIa
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1987; 13(5):791-6. PubMed ID: 3692050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech perception in rats: use of duration and rise time cues in labeling of affricate/fricative sounds.
    Reed P; Howell P; Sackin S; Pizzimenti L; Rosen S
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Sep; 80(2):205-15. PubMed ID: 14674729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the role of the amplitude of the fricative noise in the perception of place of articulation in voiceless fricative consonants.
    Behrens S; Blumstein SE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Sep; 84(3):861-7. PubMed ID: 3183204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of preceding fricative on stop consonant perception.
    Mann VA; Repp BH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Feb; 69(2):548-58. PubMed ID: 7462477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A unified account of categorical effects in phonetic perception.
    Kronrod Y; Coppess E; Feldman NH
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1681-1712. PubMed ID: 27220996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Close but not proximate: the significance of phonological segments in speaking depends on their functional engagement.
    O'Seaghdha PG; Chen JY; Chen TM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Jan; 110(1):E3. PubMed ID: 23223681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Structure and duration of vowels together specify fricative voicing.
    Soli SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Aug; 72(2):366-78. PubMed ID: 7119279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perception of basic emotions from speech prosody in adolescents with Asperger's syndrome.
    Heikkinen J; Jansson-Verkasalo E; Toivanen J; Suominen K; Väyrynen E; Moilanen I; Seppänen T
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2010 Oct; 35(3):113-20. PubMed ID: 19883170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [New approach to determining the phonetic similarity of stimuli and its testing in an automated experiment].
    Chistovich LA; Chikhman VN; Ogorodnikova EA
    Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1981 May; 67(5):704-11. PubMed ID: 7286306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reply to O’Seaghdha et al.: Primary phonological planning units in Chinese are phonemically specified.
    Qu Q; Damian MF; Kazanina N
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Jan; 110(1):E4. PubMed ID: 23405390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the perception of speech sounds as biologically significant signals.
    Pisoni DB
    Brain Behav Evol; 1979; 16(5-6):330-50. PubMed ID: 399200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Models and mechanisms in speech perception. Species comparisons provide further contributions.
    Kuhl PK
    Brain Behav Evol; 1979; 16(5-6):374-408. PubMed ID: 399202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of speech recognition ability with different speech processing strategies by Korean cochlear implantees.
    Kim HN; Shim YJ; Kim YM; Cho GJ; Moon SK
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1992 Aug; 101(8):659-64. PubMed ID: 1497271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fricative-stop coarticulation: acoustic and perceptual evidence.
    Repp BH; Mann VA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Jun; 71(6):1562-7. PubMed ID: 7108031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The infancy of infant speech perception: the first decade of research.
    Morse PA
    Brain Behav Evol; 1979; 16(5-6):351-73. PubMed ID: 399201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Induced gamma oscillations index individual differences in speech sound perception and production.
    Ou J; Law SP
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Dec; 121():28-36. PubMed ID: 30391567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bridging automatic speech recognition and psycholinguistics: extending Shortlist to an end-to-end model of human speech recognition.
    Scharenborg O; ten Bosch L; Boves L; Norris D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Dec; 114(6 Pt 1):3032-5. PubMed ID: 14714783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assimilation violation and spoken-language processing: a supplementary report.
    Weber A
    Lang Speech; 2002 Mar; 45(Pt 1):37-46. PubMed ID: 12375818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phonetic training and non-native speech perception--New memory traces evolve in just three days as indexed by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and behavioural measures.
    Tamminen H; Peltola MS; Kujala T; Näätänen R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Jul; 97(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 25956191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.