These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7323674)

  • 1. Speech recognition performance at loudness discomfort level.
    Dirks DD; Kamm CA; Dubno JR; Velde TM
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 7323674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Loudness discomfort level for speech: comparison of two instructional sets for saturation sound pressure level selection.
    Beattie RC; Svihovec DA; Carmen RE; Kunkel HA
    Ear Hear; 1980; 1(4):197-205. PubMed ID: 7409356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of extended-range frequency-response amplification in hearing aids.
    Forrester JI; Raffin MJ
    J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 7187908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Loudness discomfort levels of hearing-impaired listeners using speech material.
    Edgerton BJ; Beattie RC; Wides JW
    Ear Hear; 1980; 1(4):206-10. PubMed ID: 7409357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Amplification bandwidth and speech intelligibility for two listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Skinner MW; Karstaedt MM; Miller JD
    Audiology; 1982; 21(3):251-68. PubMed ID: 7092728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of presentation levels to maximize word recognition scores.
    Guthrie LA; Mackersie CL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Jun; 20(6):381-90. PubMed ID: 19594086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnitude estimation of loudness. III: Performance of selected hearing aid users.
    Margolis RH
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Sep; 28(3):411-20. PubMed ID: 4046582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of sensorineural hearing loss on loudness discomfort level and most comfortable loudness judgments.
    Kamm C; Dirks DD; Mickey MR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1978 Dec; 21(4):668-81. PubMed ID: 745368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hearing aid saturation, coherence, and aided loudness discomfort.
    Fortune TW; Preves DA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Mar; 3(2):81-93. PubMed ID: 1600219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Loudness discrimination of speech signals spectrally shaped by a simulated hearing aid.
    Rakerd B; Punch J; Hooks W; Amlani A; Vander Velde TJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Dec; 42(6):1285-94. PubMed ID: 10599612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Loudness summation of equal loud narrowband signals in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Ewert SD; Oetting D
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S71-S80. PubMed ID: 28971746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Control of hearing-aid saturated sound pressure level by frequency-shaped output compression limiting.
    McDermott HJ; Dean MR; Dillon H
    Scand Audiol; 1999; 28(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 10207954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Duration, compression, and the aided loudness discomfort level.
    Fortune T; Scheller T
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):329-41. PubMed ID: 10981609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship between pure-tone and speech loudness discomfort levels among hearing-impaired subjects.
    Beattie RC; Boyd RL
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1986 May; 51(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 3702359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a dual-channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Johnson JS; Clark TM; Pluvinage V
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):349-70. PubMed ID: 1487095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
    Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of digital signal processing features on children's speech recognition and loudness perception.
    Crukley J; Scollie SD
    Am J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 23(1):99-115. PubMed ID: 24018572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods.
    Moore BC; Sęk A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 22878351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Field trials using a digital hearing aid with active noise reduction and dual-microphone directionality.
    Boymans M; Dreschler WA
    Audiology; 2000; 39(5):260-8. PubMed ID: 11093610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing AIDS on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Korczak PA; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):165-85. PubMed ID: 15809543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.