These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Evaluation of three applanation tonometers in dogs. Priehs DR; Gum GG; Whitley RD; Moore LE Am J Vet Res; 1990 Oct; 51(10):1547-50. PubMed ID: 2240775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of two applanation tonometers in cats. Miller PE; Pickett JP; Majors LJ; Kurzman ID Am J Vet Res; 1991 Nov; 52(11):1917-21. PubMed ID: 1785739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of two applanation tonometers in horses. Miller PE; Pickett JP; Majors LJ Am J Vet Res; 1990 Jun; 51(6):935-7. PubMed ID: 2368953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of applanation tonometers in dogs and horses. Dziezyc J; Millichamp NJ; Smith WB J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1992 Aug; 201(3):430-3. PubMed ID: 1506245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the use of new handheld tonometers and established applanation tonometers in dogs. Görig C; Coenen RT; Stades FC; Djajadiningrat-Laanen SC; Boevé MH Am J Vet Res; 2006 Jan; 67(1):134-44. PubMed ID: 16426223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the human and canine Schiotz tonometry conversion tables in clinically normal dogs. Miller PE; Pickett JP J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1992 Oct; 201(7):1021-5. PubMed ID: 1429125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the human and canine Schiotz tonometry conversion tables in clinically normal cats. Miller PE; Pickett JP J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1992 Oct; 201(7):1017-20. PubMed ID: 1429124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Calibration of the Schiøtz tonometer for the normal canine eye. Peiffer RL; Gelatt KN; Jessen CR; Gum GG; Gwin RM; Davis J Am J Vet Res; 1977 Nov; 38(11):1881-9. PubMed ID: 931169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The ocular blood flow tonograph: a new instrument for the measurement of intraocular pressure in rabbits. Chidlow G; Nash MS; Crowhurst C; Bron AJ; Osborne NN Exp Eye Res; 1996 Oct; 63(4):463-9. PubMed ID: 8944553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Manometric calibration and comparison of TonoLab and TonoPen tonometers in rats with experimental glaucoma and in normal mice. Pease ME; Hammond JC; Quigley HA J Glaucoma; 2006 Dec; 15(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 17106364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the rebound tonometer (ICare) to the applanation tonometer (Tonopen XL) in normotensive dogs. Leiva M; Naranjo C; Peña MT Vet Ophthalmol; 2006; 9(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 16409240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of three tonometers for measuring intraocular pressure in rabbits. Abrams LS; Vitale S; Jampel HD Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Apr; 37(5):940-4. PubMed ID: 8603880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electronic tonometry in the newborn. Dominguez A; Alvarez MG; Banos MS Adv Ophthalmol; 1975; 29():88-125. PubMed ID: 1130240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of the new ICare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes. García-Resúa C; González-Meijome JM; Gilino J; Yebra-Pimentel E Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 83(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 16501412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of riboflavin-UVA-induced collagen cross-linking on intraocular pressure measurement. Romppainen T; Bachmann LM; Kaufmann C; Kniestedt C; Mrochen M; Thiel MA Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Dec; 48(12):5494-8. PubMed ID: 18055797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dynamic contour tonometry in comparison to intracameral IOP measurements. Boehm AG; Weber A; Pillunat LE; Koch R; Spoerl E Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Jun; 49(6):2472-7. PubMed ID: 18316699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]