These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7325805)
1. Referring to the paper by Zbinden and Flury-Roversi. Significance of the LD50 test for toxicological evaluation of chemical substances. Griffin JP Arch Toxicol; 1981 Nov; 49(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 7325805 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Significance of the LD50-test for the toxicological evaluation of chemical substances. Zbinden G; Flury-Roversi M Arch Toxicol; 1981 Apr; 47(2):77-99. PubMed ID: 7271444 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reduction of animal use for toxicological evaluation: the Netherlands Health Council report on the LD50. van Noordwijk J; Seegers AJ Dev Biol Stand; 1986; 64():277-85. PubMed ID: 3792652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A simple method for screening assessment of acute toxicity of chemicals. Yamanaka S; Hashimoto M; Tobe M; Kobayashi K; Sekizawa J; Nishimura M Arch Toxicol; 1990; 64(4):262-8. PubMed ID: 2386428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The LD50 test and in vitro toxicology strategies. Nardone RM Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh); 1983; 52 Suppl 2():65-79. PubMed ID: 6880788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The value of animal experiments in testing the acute toxicity of substances; a recommendation by the LD50 Commission of the Public Health Council]. Wieriks J Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1984 Sep; 128(36):1721-3. PubMed ID: 6483046 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. LD50 - its value for the pharmaceutical industry in safety evaluation of drugs. Malmfors T; Teiling A Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh); 1983; 52 Suppl 2():229-46. PubMed ID: 6136150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The LD50 in comparison with acute toxicity. A critical evaluation of the present method]. Bass R; Günzel P; Henschler D; König J; Lorke D; Neubert D; Schütz E; Schuppan D; Zbinden G Arzneimittelforschung; 1983; 33(1):81-3. PubMed ID: 6681973 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Method for assessing the combined action of hazardous substances in toxicological hygiene research]. Fedorenko VI Gig Sanit; 1987 Oct; (10):56-8. PubMed ID: 3692195 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Approximate lethal dose versus median lethal dose in acute toxicity testing of pharmaceuticals. A retrospective study. Vit PJ Arch Toxicol; 1989; 63(4):343-4. PubMed ID: 2764724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The international validation of a fixed-dose procedure as an alternative to the classical LD50 test. van den Heuvel MJ; Clark DG; Fielder RJ; Koundakjian PP; Oliver GJ; Pelling D; Tomlinson NJ; Walker AP Food Chem Toxicol; 1990 Jul; 28(7):469-82. PubMed ID: 2210519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The clinical relevance of the LD50. Garst JE Vet Hum Toxicol; 1987 Apr; 29(2):160. PubMed ID: 3576952 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A national validation study of the acute-toxic-class method--an alternative to the LD50 test. Schlede E; Mischke U; Roll R; Kayser D Arch Toxicol; 1992; 66(7):455-70. PubMed ID: 1444812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A toxicity estimation model. Enslein K J Environ Pathol Toxicol; 1978; 2(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 722214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Is the prediction of LD50 using cell cultures generally valid?]. Halle W; Göres E; Baeger I Pharmazie; 1987 Dec; 42(12):848-50. PubMed ID: 3444850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]