These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7327839)
1. Considerations in determining matching criteria and stratum sizes for case-control studies. Greenland S; Morgenstern H; Thomas DC Int J Epidemiol; 1981 Dec; 10(4):389-92. PubMed ID: 7327839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The feasibility of matching and quota sampling in epidemiologic studies. Walter SD Am J Epidemiol; 1989 Aug; 130(2):379-89. PubMed ID: 2665478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimum sample size determination in stratified case-control studies with cost considerations. Nam JM; Fears TR Stat Med; 1992 Feb; 11(4):547-56. PubMed ID: 1609184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In defense of matching. Karon JM; Kupper LL Am J Epidemiol; 1982 Nov; 116(5):852-66. PubMed ID: 7148808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Matching in epidemiologic studies: validity and efficiency considerations. Kupper LL; Karon JM; Kleinbaum DG; Morgenstern H; Lewis DK Biometrics; 1981 Jun; 37(2):271-91. PubMed ID: 7272415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sample sizes for individually matched case-control studies: a group sequential approach. Pasternack BS; Shore RE Am J Epidemiol; 1982 May; 115(5):778-84. PubMed ID: 7081206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Matching on a non-risk factor in the design of case-control studies does not always result in an efficiency loss. Kalish LA Am J Epidemiol; 1986 Mar; 123(3):551-4. PubMed ID: 3946401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Matched case-control designs and overmatched analyses. Brookmeyer R; Liang KY; Linet M Am J Epidemiol; 1986 Oct; 124(4):693-701. PubMed ID: 3752063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sample size calculation for epidemiologic studies: principles and methods. Kamangar F; Islami F Arch Iran Med; 2013 May; 16(5):295-300. PubMed ID: 23641744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reducing population stratification bias: stratum matching is better than exposure. Lee WC; Wang LY J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 18619810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Methodological issues in case-control studies: validity and power of various design/analysis strategies. Howe GR; Choi BC Int J Epidemiol; 1983 Jun; 12(2):238-45. PubMed ID: 6874220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of misclassification in matched-pair case-control studies. Greenland S Am J Epidemiol; 1982 Aug; 116(2):402-6. PubMed ID: 7114048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Secondary analysis: theoretical, methodological, and practical considerations. Clarke SP; Cossette S Can J Nurs Res; 2000 Dec; 32(3):109-29. PubMed ID: 11928128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methods of determining sample sizes in clinical trials. Jeyaseelan L; Rao PS Indian Pediatr; 1989 Feb; 26(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 2753525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Designing case-control studies. Yanagawa T Environ Health Perspect; 1979 Oct; 32():143-56. PubMed ID: 540588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost and efficiency in the choice of matched and unmatched case-control study designs. Thompson WD; Kelsey JL; Walter SD Am J Epidemiol; 1982 Nov; 116(5):840-51. PubMed ID: 7148807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sample size determination in studies with matched pairs. Fleiss JL; Levin B J Clin Epidemiol; 1988; 41(8):727-30. PubMed ID: 3418361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]