These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7328072)

  • 21. Use of differential reinforcement of other behavior during dyadic instruction to reduce stereotyped behavior of autistic students.
    Haring TG; Breen CG; Pitts-Conway V; Gaylord-Ross R
    Am J Ment Defic; 1986 May; 90(6):694-702. PubMed ID: 3717225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The use of DRO to reduce stereotypic head weaving in a profoundly retarded adult.
    Aguerrevere L; Collins C; Panyan MV
    Acta Cient Venez; 1984; 35(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 6516685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The use of a positive procedure to increase engagement on-task and decrease challenging behavior.
    Beare PL; Severson S; Brandt P
    Behav Modif; 2004 Jan; 28(1):28-44. PubMed ID: 14710706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prevalence of stereotypy among institutionalized nonambulatory profoundly mentally retarded people.
    Dura JR; Mulick JA; Rasnake LK
    Am J Ment Defic; 1987 Mar; 91(5):548-9. PubMed ID: 3565499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Negative side effects of noncontingent reinforcement.
    Vollmer TR; Ringdahl JE; Roane HS; Marcus BA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(1):161-4. PubMed ID: 9157097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Stereotypic behavior of mentally retarded adults adjunctive to a positive reinforcement schedule.
    Wieseler NA; Hanson RH; Chamberlain TP; Thompson T
    Res Dev Disabil; 1988; 9(4):393-403. PubMed ID: 2974600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The reductive effects of noncontingent reinforcement fixed-time versus variable-time schedules.
    Carr JE; Kellum KK; Chong IM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(4):505-9. PubMed ID: 11800191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Response interruption and DRL for the reduction of rapid eating.
    Lennox DB; Miltenberger RG; Donnelly DR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1987; 20(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 3667477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Identifying profoundly mentally retarded subtypes as a means of institutional grouping.
    Rago WV
    Am J Ment Defic; 1977 Mar; 81(5):470-3. PubMed ID: 848512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reinforcement of mediating behavior on a spaced-responding schedule.
    SEGAL-RECHTSCHAFFEN E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1963 Jan; 6(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 13987673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of DRO and DRI on rate of suppression of self-injurious behavior.
    Tarpley HD; Schroeder SR
    Am J Ment Defic; 1979 Sep; 84(2):188-94. PubMed ID: 158980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of drugs on response duration differentiation. VI: differential effects under differential reinforcement of low rates of responding schedules.
    McClure GY; McMillan DE
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1997 Jun; 281(3):1368-80. PubMed ID: 9190873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Functional assessment, curricular revision, and severe behavior problems.
    Dunlap G; Kern-Dunlap L; Clarke S; Robbins FR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1991; 24(2):387-97. PubMed ID: 1890054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Haloperidol treatment with chronically medicated residents: dose effects on clinical behavior and reinforcement contingencies.
    Aman MG; Teehan CJ; White AJ; Turbott SH; Vaithianathan C
    Am J Ment Retard; 1989 Jan; 93(4):452-60. PubMed ID: 2649118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reinforcement of cooperation between profoundly retarded adults.
    Samaras MS; Ball TS
    Am J Ment Defic; 1975 Jul; 80(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 1180266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reduction of stereotypic behaviours using differential reinforcement procedures and momentary restraint.
    Barton LE; Repp AC; Brulle AR
    J Ment Defic Res; 1985 Mar; 29 ( Pt 1)():71-9. PubMed ID: 4009705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of community and center-based settings on the alertness of persons with profound mental retardation.
    Belfiore PJ; Browder DM; Mace FC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1993; 26(3):401-2. PubMed ID: 8407688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A laboratory comparison of two variations of differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate procedures.
    Jessel J; Borrero JC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(2):314-24. PubMed ID: 24740374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effects of presession manipulations on automatically maintained challenging behavior and task responding.
    Chung YC; Cannella-Malone HI
    Behav Modif; 2010 Nov; 34(6):479-502. PubMed ID: 20660927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Differential Reinforcement of Low Rate Schedules Reduce Severe Problem Behavior.
    Bonner AC; Borrero JC
    Behav Modif; 2018 Sep; 42(5):747-764. PubMed ID: 28922928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.