These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7329047)
1. Tone-on-tone masking in subjects with normal hearing and with sensorineural hearing loss. Chung DY J Speech Hear Res; 1981 Dec; 24(4):506-13. PubMed ID: 7329047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The relative role of beats and combination tones in determining the shapes of masking patterns: II. Hearing-impaired listeners. Alcántara JI; Moore BC Hear Res; 2002 Mar; 165(1-2):103-16. PubMed ID: 12031520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech. Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Informational masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. Kidd G; Arbogast TL; Mason CR; Walsh M J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2002 Jun; 3(2):107-19. PubMed ID: 12162362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Linearized response growth inferred from growth-of-masking slopes in ears with cochlear hearing loss. Nelson DA; Schroder AC J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Apr; 101(4):2186-201. PubMed ID: 9104021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Release from upward spread of masking in regions of high-frequency hearing loss. Nelson DA; Schroder AC J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2266-77. PubMed ID: 8865635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-level psychophysical tuning curves: simultaneous masking by pure tones and 100-Hz-wide noise bands. Nelson DA; Fortune TW J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):360-73. PubMed ID: 2046360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Nelson DA; Schroder AC; Wojtczak M J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2045-64. PubMed ID: 11681384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Additivity of masking in normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Oxenham AJ; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Oct; 98(4):1921-34. PubMed ID: 7593916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Growth of low-pass masking of pure tones and speech for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners. Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3113-24. PubMed ID: 8550937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recovery from on- and off-frequency forward masking in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. Wojtczak M; Oxenham AJ J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):247-56. PubMed ID: 20649220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modulation masking within and across carriers for subjects with normal and impaired hearing. Sek A; Baer T; Crinnion W; Springgay A; Moore BC J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):1143-53. PubMed ID: 26328728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spread of masking in normal subjects and in subjects with high-frequency hearing loss. Trees DE; Turner CW Audiology; 1986; 25(2):70-83. PubMed ID: 3707439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of inherent envelope fluctuations in forward maskers for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. Svec A; Dubno JR; Nelson PB J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1336-43. PubMed ID: 25786946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Further interpretation of the threshold of octave masking (TOM) test. Olsen CC; Berry GA Scand Audiol; 1979; 8(4):217-33. PubMed ID: 531475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Frequency selectivity and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners with equivalent masked thresholds. Dubno JR; Schaefer AB J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Feb; 97(2):1165-74. PubMed ID: 7876438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of cochlear impairment and equivalent-threshold masking on psychoacoustic tuning curves. Florentine M Audiology; 1992; 31(5):241-53. PubMed ID: 1449429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]