These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 7330094)

  • 1. [The influence of quality and quantity on the perception of stressed vowels in German (author's transl)].
    Sendlmeier WF
    Phonetica; 1981; 38(5-6):291-308. PubMed ID: 7330094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of personal characteristics of the speaker on phonetic quality in perception of vowels.
    Fox RA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Oct; 53(2):515-9. PubMed ID: 7312538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Grouping of vowel harmonics by frequency modulation: absence of effects on phonemic categorization.
    Gardner RB; Darwin CJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1986 Sep; 40(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 3774502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulus variability and processing dependencies in speech perception.
    Mullennix JW; Pisoni DB
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Apr; 47(4):379-90. PubMed ID: 2345691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis and perception of spectral 1/f characteristics of amplitude and period fluctuations in normal sustained vowels.
    Aoki N; Ifukube T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jul; 106(1):423-33. PubMed ID: 10420632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross-language differences in how voice quality and
    Yanushevskaya I; Gobl C; Ní Chasaide A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Nov; 144(5):2730. PubMed ID: 30522326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic and perceptual parameters relating to connected speech are more reliable measures of hoarseness than parameters relating to sustained vowels.
    Halberstam B
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2004; 66(2):70-3. PubMed ID: 15162004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Issues in forensic voice.
    Hollien H; Huntley Bahr R; Harnsberger JD
    J Voice; 2014 Mar; 28(2):170-84. PubMed ID: 24176301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences in self-rated, perceived, and acoustic voice qualities between high- and low-fatigue groups.
    Cho SW; Yin CS; Park YB; Park YJ
    J Voice; 2011 Sep; 25(5):544-52. PubMed ID: 21051198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels.
    Maryn Y; Corthals P; Van Cauwenberge P; Roy N; De Bodt M
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):540-55. PubMed ID: 19883993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Characteristics of the auditory spectral diffraction essential for distinguishing soft vowels from fricative consonants in perception].
    Zhukov SIa
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1987; 13(5):791-6. PubMed ID: 3692050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual confusions of high-pitched sung vowels.
    Miller D
    J Voice; 2002 Mar; 16(1):143-4; author reply 144-6. PubMed ID: 12002882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of tonal movement and vowel quality on intelligibility in singing.
    Andreas T
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2006; 31(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16517520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The role of speech sound expectation in categorical perception (author's transl)].
    Kohn K
    Phonetica; 1981; 38(5-6):309-19. PubMed ID: 7330095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual assimilation and L2 learning: evidence from the perception of Southern British English vowels by native speakers of Greek and Japanese.
    Lengeris A
    Phonetica; 2009; 66(3):169-87. PubMed ID: 19776666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence for language transfer leading to a perceptual advantage for non-native listeners.
    Chang CB; Mishler A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2700-10. PubMed ID: 23039462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. F0 in the production of lenis and fortis plosives.
    Kohler KJ
    Phonetica; 1982; 39(4-5):199-218. PubMed ID: 7156204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integrality in the perception of tongue root position and voice quality in vowels.
    Kingston J; Macmillan NA; Dickey LW; Thorburn R; Bartels C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Mar; 101(3):1696-709. PubMed ID: 9069637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the variability in F0 patterning and the function of F0 timing in languages where pitch cues stress.
    Thorsen N
    Phonetica; 1982; 39(4-5):302-16. PubMed ID: 7156210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phonetic considerations in the design of voice assessment material.
    Abberton E
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2005; 30(3-4):175-80. PubMed ID: 16287659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.